Jump to content

2024 - 2025 Schedule Thread


Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 258
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

46 minutes ago, Slufan10 said:

Why not play Lindenwood or SEMO instead of non-d1s?

I've heard it explained that playing a very low ranked d1 team hurts your NET more than playing a non-D1 team (which doesn't count at all against you). Maybe one of our resident schedule nerds can explain it in more detail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, slu92 said:

Better win A10 Tournament or it’s NIT or bust. 

Not saying last year was anything special but it’s about the exact same sos as last years OOC, and potentially a better conf schedule than last year .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it’s a pretty  crappy schedule but I will give them a pass for this year. The Ford administration certainly didn’t leave them anything. A thanksgiving tournament sure would have helped. Hopefully we will win enough that better teams will be open to scheduling us next year. Somehow a Dayton can put together a decent schedule. 

VeniceMenace likes this
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, willie said:

I think it’s a pretty  crappy schedule but I will give them a pass for this year. The Ford administration certainly didn’t leave them anything. A thanksgiving tournament sure would have helped. Hopefully we will win enough that better teams will be open to scheduling us next year. Somehow a Dayton can put together a decent schedule. 

That’s valid. With nothing on the schedule for this year, and the MTE they were trying to get in folding, it is what it is. I do wish they would have gotten together with Bradley, apparently they are still looking. I’d prefer them to any D3 team, but oh well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Lord Elrond said:

That’s valid. With nothing on the schedule for this year, and the MTE they were trying to get in folding, it is what it is. I do wish they would have gotten together with Bradley, apparently they are still looking. I’d prefer them to any D3 team, but oh well.

Yeah I will assume there were issues why Scherzer didn’t connect with Wardell, who is still looking for games.  Or perhaps they talked and the dates wouldn’t work. No need to speculate because the game didn’t happen. I thought we would use the good old boy network for a second game with the Valley. 
So what do you think, 4 buy games?  The two non-D1, Chicago State and Jackson State?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, HoosierPal said:

Yeah I will assume there were issues why Scherzer didn’t connect with Wardell, who is still looking for games.  Or perhaps they talked and the dates wouldn’t work. No need to speculate because the game didn’t happen. I thought we would use the good old boy network for a second game with the Valley. 
So what do you think, 4 buy games?  The two non-D1, Chicago State and Jackson State?

Most likely. Maybe Chicago St was so desperate they came with having to be paid like a buy game. But only maybe, I think 4 buy games is right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a flashy brand name yea it’s not that great of a schedule. But if we replaced Grand Canyon with Virginia, and San Fran with Oklahoma st I think fans would have been ok with it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This issue has been a problem for most schools like us so why are we surprised.  Yes, I saw the Dayton non-conference schedule and yes something like that would be great but as of right now we aren't Dayton - I know the truth hurts but we are what we are for whatever the reasons.  It is also not uncommon for a new coach who is taking over for one who failed to have trouble scheduling their first year.  At this point, Schertz needs to put wins on the board, get his style of play incorporated in the players and program and that comes with playing and succeeding.  Had Ford been back I was seriously considering not renewing after over 40 years of having season tix - big decision.  I decided to renew because Ford was finally dumped, and it looked like they made a hire for success.  I can live with this schedule and hope for improvement in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're locked into 3 games for next season - at Loyola Marymount, Grand Canyon at home, and San Francisco at home - so we have a solid foundation in place. We had a better MTE fall apart this season and that isn't going to happen twice in a row. Win enough this season and we're going to be a more attractive matchup for power conference teams who held off this year.

Next season's schedule will be much stronger.

This year's schedule certainly isn't going to be a draw for casual fans, and I feel bad for season ticket holders. The draw is going to be the style of play and the players themselves. We will be favored to win every non-conference home game. Not much margin for error this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BrettJollyComedyHour said:

Since this thread doesn't specify men's or women's schedule, @Pistol @billikenfan05 do y'all know anything about the women's non-con schedule?

Just the event in Palm Springs on 11/29 when we play USC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if they considered in-season home and away? Bradley is close, and that could probably be arranged.

"AD of the Year" level scheduling.

JMM28 likes this
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...