Jump to content

Fall 2017 allegations against unnamed players (aka Situation 2)


DoctorB

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

4 minutes ago, DeSmetBilliken said:

You have to have someone guiding the S.S. Gold Standard while Kratky’s on maternity leave.

You've gotta love the BS about "best practices" and "evidenced based educational programs." Classic buzz words to make it sound more legitimate than it really is.

 

Good luck figuring out a way to make the survey completely anonymous while not having students input their banner ID first to protect the survey from MBM's....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Box and Won said:

The survey lacked integrity before the MBMs caught wind of it.

What are you talking about, it's the first of it's kind and was definitely the best way to access the severity of the punishm...I mean the status of sexual assault at SLU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, how dumb are the people that run the Title IX office?  Either they are lying or they are so dumb they shouldn't be running a bingo night.  Two years developing it and you post it when it's pretty obvious all the alumni are pissed and think the Title IX investigation is sham.  Shocking it was compromised.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bills_06 said:

Honestly, how dumb are the people that run the Title IX office?  Either they are lying or they are so dumb they shouldn't be running a bingo night.  Two years developing it and you post it when it's pretty obvious all the alumni are pissed and think the Title IX investigation is sham.  Shocking it was compromised.  

How dumb do they think people are? It was OBVIOUS how quickly that was thrown together 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, majerus mojo said:

so, uh, the appeals seem to be going well... 

I wouldn't assume that they have heard back on their appeals, yet.  They might have decided they were done with SLU regardless of how the appeal turns out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Spoon-Balls said:

New email sent out, they've been reading the board:

 

puco5Ir.png

This letter reveals how SLU's Title IX office was trying to influence the process in situation two.  Does anyone really believe Kratky or any boss would spend two years on a project as important as this and then rush it out without proof reading it?  Also, anyone believe Kratky would schedule the roll out of something as important to her job as this while she knew she would be on maternity leave?  This was supposed to roll out later this year, but they rushed it in attempt to create a climate hostile to the players.

Rosenblum needs to subpoena every communication on this project. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...