rgbilliken Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 5 hours ago, Pistol said: A lot of posters are overreacting to a very, very small number of people on Twitter. I wouldn't worry about them. There are people arguing on Twitter about literally everything at all times. This particular group being complained about is tiny and has no say in this particular matter. Just ignore them and let the case play out. Also, for what it's worth, social justice is a fundamental tenet of Jesuit teaching - and Catholicism as a whole, for that matter. I know that the terms "social justice" and "social justice warrior" have become political euphemisms in recent years, but bear in mind that social justice on a basic level is supposed to factor into everything the University does. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheeseman Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 26 minutes ago, tarheelbilliken said: I lived in the old Gries from 9/70 to 5/73. It was different back then. No booze, if you had a female guest it was only between the hours of 6-11p. Also the door had be left open. After dealing with that, for my senior year and one year to get my masters, I lived in Laclede Town You actually followed the rules - not everybody did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MusicCityBilliken Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 11 minutes ago, cheeseman said: You actually followed the rules - not everybody did. I know, a lot bad influences in that dorm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
almaman Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 1 hour ago, Quality Is Job 1 said: I was born in 1969, so I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't disparage the year of my birth! you may be the issue White Pelican and Zink like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zink Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 18 minutes ago, almaman said: you may be the issue Brilliant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cgeldmacher Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 This is probably very wrong, but I can't help thinking about the blank look on the face of some twenty something year old gal at her first job sitting behind a counter at DuBourg and some old lady comes in to report that she was sexually assaulted in Griesedick back in 1969. I envision a long pause followed by the girl behind the counter getting up and trying to find what form applied to that situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
615Billiken Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 I’m surprised a security alert wasn’t sent out to students about this new accusation. Very unprofessional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quality Is Job 1 Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 1 hour ago, almaman said: you may be the issue I said "born," not "conceived." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quality Is Job 1 Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 1 hour ago, Zink said: Brilliant ha. ha. ha. My parents are from a different state. I was born in a different state. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonka Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 State of confusion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quality Is Job 1 Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 3 hours ago, Tonka said: State of confusion? I'm sure you are! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACE Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 On 11/21/2017 at 10:04 AM, Slu let the dogs out? said: you mean no later than 11/24? Looking forward to the Butler game when all of our players will be dressed! That would be this Friday. A Friday after Thanksgiving news dump would make sense. And on the court, the returning players could get a game in before heading to Butler. That would be a good scenario, but I'm expecting this to drag on longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFord and TRavs Posted November 23, 2017 Share Posted November 23, 2017 The full team is at Fords house for thanksgiving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slu72 fan Posted November 24, 2017 Share Posted November 24, 2017 5 hours ago, TFord and TRavs said: The full team is at Fords house for thanksgiving. Ford said that on the postgame show last night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsBeliever!!! Posted November 24, 2017 Share Posted November 24, 2017 So... we think tomorrow is decision day? Obviously we have no idea, but it is likely right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moytoy12 Posted November 24, 2017 Share Posted November 24, 2017 6 minutes ago, BillsBeliever!!! said: So... we think tomorrow is decision day? Obviously we have no idea, but it is likely right? Stu said Monday would be the earliest as the university is on holiday. Who knows at this point, but I suspect we won’t hear anything tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFord and TRavs Posted November 24, 2017 Share Posted November 24, 2017 1 hour ago, slu72 fan said: Ford said that on the postgame show last night Never saw that posted anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TFord and TRavs Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 24 hours until we get an answer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeSmetBilliken Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 17 minutes ago, TFord and TRavs said: 24 hours until we get an answer? Honestly, unless one of the players puts something on social media, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if we find out that they’ve been cleared (if they end up being cleared or get “time served”), merely by seeing them suited up on Tuesday night. Unless Stu Durando does some investigating to break the story, I wouldn’t expect SLU to put themselves in the news over this. In my experience of observing the SLU athletic department, their plan of action in dealing with “newsworthy” information is as follows: 1) Hope no one notices and the situation blows over 2) If it doesn’t blow over, consider whoever brought up the news to be the bad guy for bringing it up 3) At some point in time, address the situation publicly. So I’m basically SLU to try to keep this as quiet as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slufan13 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 My prediction is we never hear anything. The players magically start playing again around mid December. The players will have a reputation of being sexual assaulters for the rest of their lives because SLU never did anything to publicly clear the names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westy03 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 33 minutes ago, slufan13 said: My prediction is we never hear anything. The players magically start playing again around mid December. The players will have a reputation of being sexual assaulters for the rest of their lives because SLU never did anything to publicly clear the names. Seems likely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rgbilliken Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 35 minutes ago, slufan13 said: My prediction is we never hear anything. The players magically start playing again around mid December. The players will have a reputation of being sexual assaulters for the rest of their lives because SLU never did anything to publicly clear the names. If the title ix investigation finds nothing, I'd rather SLU keep its mouth shut other than to say "we did our due diligence and found nothing." especially, I'd rather they keep the names quiet. The last thing I'd want is for a Google search for the guys' names to pop up anything related to this whatsoever, even if it is something saying they were investigated and shown to be innocent. majerus mojo likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheeseman Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 To say that if SLU says nothing one way or the other is the reason anybody would be labeled a sexual assaulter is just silly. People who label others are the ones who do it. The school has made no comments so far one way or the other so they could easily choose that avenue for the end of it. As long as a person is not charged nor receive any punishment from the school then the non actions speak for themselves. The other shoe that would drop through this whole matter is the girls - if they filed a false police report then no comment from the school also protects them. This not a good situation no matter how it plays out. The best end would be for everybody just to move on regardless of the outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slufan13 Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 6 minutes ago, rgbilliken said: If the title ix investigation finds nothing, I'd rather SLU keep its mouth shut other than to say "we did our due diligence and found nothing." especially, I'd rather they keep the names quiet. The last thing I'd want is for a Google search for the guys' names to pop up anything related to this whatsoever, even if it is something saying they were investigated and shown to be innocent. I agree on the Google search thing but there are already people who have assumed the players are guilty simply because they are suspended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheeseman Posted November 26, 2017 Share Posted November 26, 2017 1 minute ago, slufan13 said: I agree on the Google search thing but there are already people who have assumed the players are guilty simply because they are suspended. Let them believe what they want - the not playing is nothing more than good sense by the school/coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts