David King Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 58 minutes ago, VeniceMenace said: We’re weeks away from a final verdict, what’s changing between now and then that will make tomorrow nights game more interesting than usual? Hey troll- Do you think giving VCU a double digit ass whooping will make the game more interesting than usual? How about if JGood throws in another triple double and Roby goes off for 20+ in solidarity? Have you been watching the same team as the rest of us, troll? This team is on a roll; inspired by S2. F'## Pestello and the TIX feminazis! Tomorrow night at least, the Bills are kicking ass! That's as far into the future that I care to look for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOne Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 Cold blooded “like” by the ChaifetzArena account on Twitter. Doc Chaifetz and Ross Chaifetz will see it..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyJumpUp Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 3 hours ago, Quality Is Job 1 said: Or perhaps, contrary to what many media outlets and posters here have been reporting as fact, no one who has been playing for SLU this season has been under investigation by the Title IX office and no one who has been playing in games for SLU this season played Saturday after having been suspended Friday and no one who has been playing was represented by Rosenblum. SLU won't comment, Rosenblum won't name his clients, and the team won't comment, so how exactly can anyone state as fact that Goodwin or any other player who's been playing this season has been suspended and had to file a quick appeal in order to play Saturday? If any currently playing player was a client of Rosenblum's along with Henriquez and Bishop (as it seems reasonable to assume), then why would two of them not have appeals ready to go while the other one did? Also, nothing I've read from Rosenblum suggests that only some of his clients had been suspended in interim. Graves' dad supposedly said that he didn't understand how one of the players involved could play while his son couldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChangeOfPace Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 20 minutes ago, MattyMo213 said: One current cheerleader, one ex-cheerleader who quit either late 2015 or early 2016 So for the no contact theory to hold any water, we are supposed to believe that 3 of the guys had “contact” with the one cheerleader? And the 4th didn’t? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattyMo213 Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 1 minute ago, ChangeOfPace said: So for the no contact theory to hold any water, we are supposed to believe that 3 of the guys had “contact” with the one cheerleader? And the 4th didn’t? From my understanding the cheerleader had only one-on-one contact during the whole "incident" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBills73 Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 1 hour ago, Billiken Rich said: I'm going to be holding up a sign in section 108 during free throws. Limited space. Should I go with "FREE THE 3" or "FIRE FRED" you make the call......... I like freethe3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyJumpUp Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 27 minutes ago, kmbilliken said: The post article linked on page 106 of this thread refers to the 2014 overnight bag incident. In that case the guy was suspended after his hearing based on ridiculous evidence. Two months later the assistant Vice President of Student Affairs, after having no contact with the case up to that point, stepped in, reviewed the evidence and set aside the ruling. Apparently the administration had the power to throw out the Title IX decision then. Why not now? Exactly... when they got the decision originally in this current case, they could have immediately said, no way this is too harsh of a punishment. Maybe they chose to go with it, expecting an appeal and knowing they could reduce it shortly thereafter, in an attempt to please both sides. Maybe in their minds, if they do that, the guys are being punished which should please the female side, but it was reduced from an outrageous punishment to something reasonable, which should please the male side of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kshoe Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 9 minutes ago, JohnnyJumpUp said: Exactly... when they got the decision originally in this current case, they could have immediately said, no way this is too harsh of a punishment. Maybe they chose to go with it, expecting an appeal and knowing they could reduce it shortly thereafter, in an attempt to please both sides. Maybe in their minds, if they do that, the guys are being punished which should please the female side, but it was reduced from an outrageous punishment to something reasonable, which should please the male side of it. That is what we are all hoping for at this point. A changing of punishment from the absolutely ridiculous punishments delivered Friday to something more palatable like 1 year suspensions with most of it being time served this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoon-Balls Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 24 minutes ago, MattyMo213 said: From my understanding the cheerleader had only one-on-one contact during the whole "incident" If that is the case then this is beyond insanity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73Billiken Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 2 hours ago, Billiken Rich said: I'm going to be holding up a sign in section 108 during free throws. Limited space. Should I go with "FREE THE 3" or "FIRE FRED" you make the call......... Both are appropriate. Can you make your sign double sided? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBFan Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 2 hours ago, Billiken Rich said: I'm going to be holding up a sign in section 108 during free throws. Limited space. Should I go with "FREE THE 3" or "FIRE FRED" you make the call......... #FireFreddyP thank you Rich Cannot make the VCU game will be at the next game to yell fire Pestello. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billiken Rich Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 2 minutes ago, 73Billiken said: Both are appropriate. Can you make your sign double sided? Working on it....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierBilliken Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 "Free the 3" is so yesterday. How about repeated chants of "Rose n blum" followed by chants of "File the Suit!" Then"Hey hey ho ho man-hating gotta go!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthSide_Billiken Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 Maybe we can convince the band to play, "Hey Baby" with some special lyrics for Deplorable Katherine : "Hey, Katherine! We gotta know, why do you hate men?" Or perhaps for Freddy P: "Hey, Pestello! Even Biondi knows, that you gotta go." Bobby Metzinger likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierBilliken Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 During the civil suit: Rosenblum: Um, Ms. Weathers, why did you volunteer for the Title IX Hearing Officer position? Ms. Weathers: Men are evil. Rosenblum: Could you elaborate? Ms. Weathers: Women are pure. Rosenblum: Uh, let me ask you another question. Do you think men have ever been falsely accused of sexual misconduct? Ms. Weathers: Never. All the training I have ever received show without a doubt that women never lie and men are always wrong in these situations. Rosenblum: Has any women ever been accused of sexual misconduct? Ms. Weathers: Never. Women are pure. Didn't you hear me the first time? Rosenblum: What do you post on Facebook and Twitter? Ms. Weathers: As much women rights stuff that I can. I accidentally deleted all the postings after the SLU lawyer ordered me to delete them. Rosenblum: Were there any men rights stuff posted? Ms. Weathers: Never. Men are evil. Didn't you hear me the first time? SouthSide_Billiken likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthSide_Billiken Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 1 hour ago, MattyMo213 said: From my understanding the cheerleader had only one-on-one contact during the whole "incident" This makes the whole no-contact order narrative a bit suspect. Wouldn't the no-contact order apply to 1 player then? Why would it apply to two extra players? Why wouldn't it apply to the fourth? This whole thing gets more bizarre by the minute. SLU is a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLUGuy123 Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 6 hours ago, NextYearBill said: but why has Goodwin been allowed to play????????????????????????????????? so much mystery Couldn't have Travis Ford played the supposed 3 guys who have been out all season? Like no one knew the names of the players who could have done it when the news broke but their social media posts suggest they were the ones suspended. Why would Travis Ford sit out those players but not the one who has continued to play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeSmetBilliken Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 50 minutes ago, SouthSide_Billiken said: Maybe we can convince the band to play, "Hey Baby" with some special lyrics for Deplorable Katherine : "Hey, Katherine! We gotta know, why do you hate men?" Or perhaps for Freddy P: "Hey, Pestello! Even Biondi knows, that you gotta go." Ummmm......NO. Let’s not suggest that the Band do something that will get them in trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moytoy12 Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 1 hour ago, SouthSide_Billiken said: This makes the whole no-contact order narrative a bit suspect. Wouldn't the no-contact order apply to 1 player then? Why would it apply to two extra players? Why wouldn't it apply to the fourth? This whole thing gets more bizarre by the minute. SLU is a joke. The whole "no-contact" thing, if true, if ridiculous. I mean, they still went to class...on campus...with other students. If the threat of incident was so serious, then why not provide the no-contact protection at all times wherever the player(s) went on campus? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slu72 fan Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 5 minutes ago, moytoy12 said: The whole "no-contact" thing, if true, if ridiculous. I mean, they still went to class...on campus...with other students. If the threat of incident was so serious, then why not provide the no-contact protection at all times wherever the player(s) went on campus? The best actually happened first day of classes this semester. One of the three, that has been denied attending the games for fear of contact with one of the females, shows up for class and she's there. The school pisses away money on off campus housing, and guards when the players are on campus, doesn't have enough sense to make sure they're not enrolled in the same classes. Excellent work Dr. P majerus mojo and Box and Won like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billikenfan05 Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 4 minutes ago, slu72 fan said: The best actually happened first day of classes this semester. One of the three, that has been denied attending the games for fear of contact with one of the females, shows up for class and she's there. The school pisses away money on off campus housing, and guards when the players are on campus, doesn't have enough sense to make sure they're not enrolled in the same classes. Excellent work Dr. P From what I was told the security was to protect the players from certain threats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tilkowsky Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 So what type of punishment should the players have gotten? Nothing? Was this just a boys will be boys situation and SLU should have ignored it? Because they were basketball players they can do whatever they want without repercussions? It sounded like a pretty serious situation to me. Sad that most of the posters on this site only care about wins/losses of the basketball team and not the moral fiber of the school. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Metzinger Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 8 minutes ago, Tilkowsky said: So what type of punishment should the players have gotten? Nothing? Was this just a boys will be boys situation and SLU should have ignored it? Because they were basketball players they can do whatever they want without repercussions? It sounded like a pretty serious situation to me. Sad that most of the posters on this site only care about wins/losses of the basketball team and not the moral fiber of the school. That's pure, unadulterated bull****. The moral fiber of the school is being woven by the same people who threaded their pink hats. You should be concerned by that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LindellWest Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 16 minutes ago, Tilkowsky said: So what type of punishment should the players have gotten? Nothing? Was this just a boys will be boys situation and SLU should have ignored it? Because they were basketball players they can do whatever they want without repercussions? It sounded like a pretty serious situation to me. Sad that most of the posters on this site only care about wins/losses of the basketball team and not the moral fiber of the school. Dude, no one said these guys should be up for canonization, what we are saying is that crimes (or in this case lack of) and punishment should be proportional and should be adjudicated in an unbiased manor. Not exactly extreme positions you turd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billikenfan05 Posted January 23, 2018 Share Posted January 23, 2018 3 minutes ago, LindellWest said: Dude, no one said these guys should be up for canonization, what we are saying is that crimes (or in this case lack of) and punishment should be proportional and should be adjudicated in an unbiased manor. Not exactly extreme positions you turd. 10 minutes ago, Bobby Metzinger said: That's pure, unadulterated bull****. The moral fiber of the school is being woven by the same people who threaded their pink hats. You should be concerned by that. Dudes, he's a troll. 2010andBeyond likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts