slufan13 Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 4 minutes ago, LindellWest said: While I think the two situations have little or nothing in common, you make an unfortunately good point.... I'm talking about the OTL story that came out Friday about Michigan St's basketball and football programs covering up/not suspending athletes for alleged sexual assault. It's not a perfect comparison but I think it put fear into universities everywhere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Metzinger Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 4 minutes ago, slufan13 said: I'm talking about the OTL story that came out Friday about Michigan St's basketball and football programs covering up/not suspending athletes for alleged sexual assault. It's not a perfect comparison but I think it put fear into universities everywhere While not downwind from Lansing at all, even the smallest of incidents by comparison will be swept up in the prevailing winds that have created this firestorm. It's unfortunate that the guilt-by-association list will swell exponentially as the overcrowding of society's gallows continues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills_06 Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 Statement from one female: http://www.stltoday.com/sports/college/slu/woman-in-slu-title-ix-case-releases-statement/article_ec1f936e-60da-56c5-85d9-739a6bfd3f01.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slufan13 Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Pelican Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 http://www.stltoday.com/sports/college/slu/woman-in-slu-title-ix-case-releases-statement/article_ec1f936e-60da-56c5-85d9-739a6bfd3f01.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NextYearBill Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 garbage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoon-Balls Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 So is she going to release a statement explaining why she initially lied about the assault instead of admitting right off the bat that this was all about a case of "sexual exploitation"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franchise_08 Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 Consent to the filming of the incident is the big question here. If this is the case, the why punish those not filming? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobillsgo Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 Just now, Spoon-Balls said: So is she going to release a statement explaining why she initially lied about the assault instead of admitting right off the bat that this was all about a case of "sexual exploitation"? Yeah this is a joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMM28 Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 Can anyone actually read that? It reads like something written by an online troll, not (what I assume) is a lawyer? It reads to me as though the title ix investigation was all about the filming, and that everyone has admitted the acts were consensual besides that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SShoe Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 I really expected more from this statement. Total weak sauce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoon-Balls Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 1 minute ago, gobillsgo said: Yeah this is a joke Wait I just re-read her statement. I she seriously implying that sexual exploitation (by one of the players) is equivalent, in this case, to full blown assault by all of them? What the fuock.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe_davola Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 Knowing but not verbally saying anything..get the hell outta here with that bull**** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billiken_roy Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 it is embarrassing that slu has students of this mental ability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlarry Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 Even after reading her statement the punishment seems excessive. If they didn't want it filmed why not ask them to turn off the camera or stop banging away? After reading the statement I'm even more positive this is a case of buyers remorse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slufan13 Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 Just now, Spoon-Balls said: Wait I just re-read her statement. I she seriously implying that sexual exploitation (by one of the players) is equivalent, in this case, to full blown assault by all of them? What the fock.... I've had a theory for a while that all four players were taking video/pictures but only one posted them publicly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianstl Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 In MO explicit consent in filming of sexual acts is only required when an reasonable expectation of privacy exist. I don't know how you can claim a reasonable expectation of privacy when six other people are in the room. Plus, lack of explicit consent for filming does not equal sexual assault. Tonka and JohnnyJumpUp like this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GBL_Bills Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 So this all but confirms the issue was the act of photographing/videotaping the act? Which means that anything over a one semester suspension is complete BS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMM28 Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 The STLToday article cuts off the revenge portion on the bottom... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlarry Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 Where are the other 2? Why no statement from them. The U put this our there to help get support but it's just raising more questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kshoe Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 "it is time for the voice of a survivor to be heard" The use of the term survivor has to be sarcasm on the lawyers part right? Basically their entire complaint is about the pictures/video being taken. Not a word in that statement was actually written by the "survivor" billikenfan05 likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slufan13 Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 I liked it better when everything was in one thread. dlarry likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billikenfan05 Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 nonsense statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billikenfan05 Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 Just now, kshoe said: "it is time for the voice of a survivor to be heard" The use of the term survivor has to be sarcasm on the lawyers part right? Basically their entire complaint is about the pictures/video being taken. Not a word in that statement was actually written by the "survivor" I was waiting for someone more intelligent than I to express this opinion. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GBL_Bills Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 1 minute ago, dlarry said: Where are the other 2? Why no statement from them. The U put this our there to help get support but it's just raising more questions. This (hopefully) will backfire. This statement essentially confirms that the act of filming was the issue, not the sex act itself. Meaning expulsion is way way way way out of line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts