Jump to content

Fall 2017 allegations against unnamed players (aka Situation 2)


DoctorB

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, STL Hoops Insider said:

That’s true and it is sad. I could’ve sworn 2 of the 3 tourney bids were coached by Crews.  No rational person could harp on his last 2 years without celebrating the first 2 years and call themselves objective.

We all know who ran the show those two years and their initials were not JC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

15 minutes ago, billikenfan05 said:

I was more referring to those left when TF took the mic 

 

A lot of people left before the game was over in my section and I saw several others hitting the exits early.

A great moment, stuck it to Freddy pee pee and crew and I believe he will bring us back inspite of the forces against him.

i am all in if he stays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/20/2018 at 8:48 AM, CBFan said:

Hey self righteous saint self proclaimed high end critical thinker best Billiken fan all time #metoo started because of Hollwoods behavior that festered for years and hurt many women and those women finally spoke up and brought down Hollywood heavy weights.

#metoo is losing momentum because of over reach and the player suspensions are a clear case of that.

No charges are proof, filing a false police report of rape and no punishment is proof.

i want my 2 granddaughters protected but not like this.

Sharing pictures is sexual exploitation. That's a crime that could be pursued if law enforcement wanted to do it. Even if it's not prosecuted, certainly an institution is well within their rights to suspend an individual for a long time. Now I think 18 months and 2 years is too long, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, aj_arete said:

Sharing pictures is sexual exploitation. That's a crime that could be pursued if law enforcement wanted to do it. Even if it's not prosecuted, certainly an institution is well within their rights to suspend an individual for a long time. Now I think 18 months and 2 years is too long, though.

If you're letting people take pictures of you in the bedroom, in today's world you should expect there's a chance they'll end up on line. At the very least, you will know it is plausible. There isn't an 18-22 year old in the middle income and up world who hasn't seen all there is to see in the online porn world - and trust me, a lot of the young men and women enjoy repeating and mimicking what they see. You don't participate in group sex one day and become a self-righteous nun the next. You did the deed, own up.

And if the pictures were taken in full knowledge of the participant, I do not believe sharing is a crime. Send the exact provision, and examples of a case, to convince me otherwise.

slufanskip and billikenfan05 like this
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, aj_arete said:

Sharing pictures is sexual exploitation. That's a crime that could be pursued if law enforcement wanted to do it. Even if it's not prosecuted, certainly an institution is well within their rights to suspend an individual for a long time. Now I think 18 months and 2 years is too long, though.

I notice you made no mention of filing false police reports..that's a crime, too.  Why is that ignored? The police didn't want anything to do with this.  For the administration to react like this is unconscionable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, William Iken said:

If you're letting people take pictures of you in the bedroom, in today's world you should expect there's a chance they'll end up on line. At the very least, you will know it is plausible. There isn't an 18-22 year old in the middle income and up world who hasn't seen all there is to see in the online porn world - and trust me, a lot of the young men and women enjoy repeating and mimicking what they see. You don't participate in group sex one day and become a self-righteous nun the next. You did the deed, own up.

And if the pictures were taken in full knowledge of the participant, I do not believe sharing is a crime. Send the exact provision, and examples of a case, to convince me otherwise.

What if the pics or videos were taken without permission and shared without permission 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were the pictures shared with friends or did they make posters and paste them on campus?  If it's the latter then the players deserve punishment but if it's the former who cares.  Kids of that generation photograph everything.  I get the feeling these racist are trying to make an undefendable excuse for a racist decision.

SouthSide_Billiken likes this
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Coach314 said:

What if the pics or videos were taken without permission and shared without permission 🤔

If the pictures were took without permission and then shared then they would have been charged with a crime much earlier in the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Coach314 said:

What if the pics or videos were taken without permission and shared without permission 🤔

Spoken by a guy who is drooling over the prospect of Goodwin and Gordon making it to scum bag u.  Take your crap to tigerboard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, TJHawk said:

Were the pictures shared with friends or did they make posters and paste them on campus?  If it's the latter then the players deserve punishment but if it's the former who cares.  Kids of that generation photograph everything.  I get the feeling these racist are trying to make an undefendable excuse for a racist decision.

Supposedly they were posted on Snapchat the night of. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...