kshoe

I don't read this board as much as I used to, but it seems like every time I read SLU92 it's something controversial and often quite negative. So consider the source on this "rumor." These days I don't think academics matter for any schools outside of the Ivy league. The "student" athlete part of being a college athlete is pretty non-existent.

Roz is one of the best people you'll ever meet. She went to grade school with my oldest son and I coach her younger sister in basketball. An outstanding soccer player! So excited for her and her family which will get to watch her play.

Don't forget the high school gym in Las Vegas for that tournament we all went to in the early 2000s. Young Bill Self coaching Illinois in the game in front of us.

I haven't read that article, but I don't think it's much of an advantage. Teams can still funnel money to players through NIL, in addition to the revenue sharing. So if Alabama only wants to contribute $3mm to revenue sharing but boosters have another $12mm to donate through NIL they can still pay their players $15mm. St. Johns and Villanova can theoretically spend $15mm on paying their basketball players but 1) they don't have that much money to spend because they don't have nearly the same tv deals that the football schools do, and 2) even if they spend $15mm it's no different than the $15mm that Alabama spends through revenue sharing and NIL combined. Money is relatively fungible and other than the tax deductibility of paying players through revenue sharing instead of NIL, there's really nothing to see here. The football schools still have far more money overall and that's all that matters these days.

I know. Getting older stinks and trying to not embarrass yourself in front of the kids is tough. But Friday may be a return to the old days...

Any money donated to the Billiken Club is tax deductible. The BC can spend it on whatever they want including Travis Ford's buyout, paying players, whatever. The IRS absolutely should shut this down but they don't/won't and Chris May is quoted in the article as talking about how these deductions are now tax deductible.

Key concept is that the Billiken Victory Fund will go away and payments to the players can come from the school itself. Those that donated to the BVF can now donate to the school and get a tax deduction. That's right, in 2025 donating to your school so that they can pay $250k for an 18 year old to play basketball is tax deductible...

I think there is too much hand-wringing over schedule strength these days. Back when the RPI was king and a 1 point win was the same as a 30 point win, schedule strength had an outsized importance. With the NET you can play a weak team and as long as you beat them handily it's the equivalent of beating a middle of the road team by a small margin. Some theory on scheduling, as pointed out by Wiz's post above, suggests you SHOULD schedule weak and try to run up the score as much as possible to trick the NET rankings. I'm not sure if the A10 is good or not, but I don't look as SOS as the determiner of that. As it stands right now, the A10 as a conference is ranked 7th in the NET (one higher than last year) has 7 teams in the top 101 of the NET rankings. The key to the only real question that matters of how many NCAA bids does the conference get isn't SOS but rather can 2 or 3 teams separate from the pack. If the teams cannibalize themselves then we'll get 1 or 2 only.

Such a ridiculous post. The Beast has won 4 of the last 8 National Championships. I guess they really do have nothing to boast about other than a storied (recent) history!

Pretty sure there is a lot of information I could use about the football games this weekend if you care to share your sports almanac.

Taking the optimistic view, hopefully he wasn't in a position to effect the result of Oregon State getting demoted (I'm not sure God himself could have saved Oregon State and Washington State once the dominos started falling) but maybe he was able to observe through the demotion just how important athletics are to the soul and prestige of a University and will do everything in his power to help SLU.

University was founded in 1818.

Agreed. The simple explanation is that Dan Caesar thought the Billikens were in the MVC, nobody caught it when it was published and someone figured it out at some point and edited it. Good old Post Dispatch.

Saw this note in Dan Caesar's column today. Not sure I fully understand what it really means: https://www.stltoday.com/sports/column/media-views/chiefs-off-to-big-start-in-st-louis-tv-ratings-but-no-match-for-presidential/article_2713cdfe-6c91-11ef-aa17-533a32661e90.html#tracking-source=home-top-story Billikens move to Matrix The Missouri Valley Conference is moving the portion of its TV package of men’s and women’s basketball telecasts that in the St. Louis market had been shown on Bally Sports Midwest to Matrix Midwest. That’s the recently rebranded outlet owned by KMOV (Channel 4) parent company Gray Media that is being pointed toward become a sports hub. It recently began carrying several programs about Missouri football, and management would like to eventually air Cardinals and/or Blues games. St. Louis University is affected by the development, although the schedule of its games that will be shown on Matrix has not yet been announced. Although Matrix has even more cable/satellite distribution problems than does Bally Sports Midwest — the only such operation carrying Matrix is Spectrum/Charter, on Channel 182 — unlike BSM it is also available over-the-air (on Channel 32). The deal covers stations in 22 markets Gray is in across Missouri, Illinois, Kentucky, Indiana, Iowa and Tennessee and also some third-party outlets outside Gray’s coverage area. “In the ever-changing landscape of live-event production and distribution, the Missouri Valley Conference remains committed to navigating the best path to reach college basketball fans, and this partnership with Gray does just that,” MVC commissioner Jeff Jackson said in a statement.

There are no guarantees in anything, but I do like the hard cap on NIL that we are willing to offer an incoming freshman because I think it fits in well with the goal of keeping the freshmen that you like down the road. If $ are all that matters to a kid coming out of high school he probably won't end up at SLU given the NIL cap we are offering. So the freshmen that do come likely aren't complete mercenaries which will lead to you have a better opportunity to retain him than the average player. Put differently, by putting a cap on the NIL you are willing to pay a player as a freshman you've self selected a group that worries more about fit than $. It's a good approach.