billikenfan05 Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 1 hour ago, David King said: Innocent until proven guilty. It is in his skank ho wife's best interests if the charge's are dropped. She can take much more of his money if he stays in the league. Piping Hut take Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goonaha Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 3 hours ago, David King said: Innocent until proven guilty. It is in his skank ho wife's best interests if the charge's are dropped. She can take much more of his money if he stays in the league. Since I'm apparently an idiot, can someone let me know if this is sarcasm? Am I supposed to laugh? Don't want to step on any Internet toes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorydays2013 Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 3 hours ago, David King said: Innocent until proven guilty. It is in his skank ho wife's best interests if the charge's are dropped. She can take much more of his money if he stays in the league. Damn this guy comes out of nowhere to post that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiseAndGrind Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 27 minutes ago, goonaha said: Since I'm apparently an idiot, can someone let me know if this is sarcasm? Am I supposed to laugh? Don't want to step on any Internet toes. Hopefully you can tell the difference between calling a recruit a "tool" for picking a different school and disparaging an apparent victim of domestic violence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hsmith19 Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 If you had been around for oldguy's posts about Mexican ice cubes and Kenny Frease's neanderthal DNA, you would understand him better. Not much mystery to what anybody else has been posting here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goonaha Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 31 minutes ago, RiseAndGrind said: Hopefully you can tell the difference between calling a recruit a "tool" for picking a different school and disparaging an apparent victim of domestic violence. Don't forget that I failed to recognize "sarcasm" from yourself and old guy related to linking a Bentley purchase to domestic violence causes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiseAndGrind Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 2 minutes ago, goonaha said: Don't forget that I failed to recognize "sarcasm" from yourself and old guy related to linking a Bentley purchase to domestic violence causes. LOL. I didn't "link" it to domestic violence. My comment was in reference to his likely upcoming suspension/waiver by the Clippers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goonaha Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 18 minutes ago, RiseAndGrind said: LOL. I didn't "link" it to domestic violence. My comment was in reference to his likely upcoming suspension/waiver by the Clippers. Hence, "failed to recognize sarcasm from yourself". Looks like you didn't understand my attempt at a joke. Internet is tough! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old guy Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 Back to the Nehanderthal DNA, it is correct to say that there is a small percentage of Nehanderthal DNA floating around within the current human genome. The range is 3% or so. This is not enough to make any of us Nehanderthal look alikes, but it shows Cromagnons did engage in sex with Nehanderthals way back when. And why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quality Is Job 1 Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 42 minutes ago, Old guy said: Back to the Nehanderthal DNA, it is correct to say that there is a small percentage of Nehanderthal DNA floating around within the current human genome. The range is 3% or so. This is not enough to make any of us Nehanderthal look alikes, but it shows Cromagnons did engage in sex with Nehanderthals way back when. And why not? Cliff Claven, is that you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Littlebill Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 1 hour ago, Old guy said: Back to the Nehanderthal DNA, it is correct to say that there is a small percentage of Nehanderthal DNA floating around within the current human genome. The range is 3% or so. This is not enough to make any of us Nehanderthal look alikes, but it shows Cromagnons did engage in sex with Nehanderthals way back when. And why not? awesome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old guy Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 2 hours ago, Quality Is Job 1 said: Cliff Claven, is that you? Who is Cliff Claven? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billiken_roy Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 how old is old guy? would have thought cliff was in his wheel house of pop topics from his glory days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billikenbooster Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 Dont mention Glory Days, or people might put you on ignore lists....LOL mhg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierPal Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 1 hour ago, Old guy said: Who is Cliff Claven? Cliff: Well ya see, Norm, it's like this. A herd of buffalo can only move as fast as the slowest buffalo. And when the herd is hunted, it is the slowest and weakest ones at the back that are killed first. This natural selection is good for the herd as a whole, because the general speed and health of the whole group keeps improving by the regular killing of the weakest members. In much the same way, the human brain can only operate as fast as the slowest brain cells. Excessive intake of alcohol, as we know, kills brain cells. But naturally, it attacks the slowest and weakest brain cells first. In this way, regular consumption of beer eliminates the weaker brain cells, making the brain a faster and more efficient machine. That's why you always feel smarter after a few beers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old guy Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 1 hour ago, billiken_roy said: how old is old guy? would have thought cliff was in his wheel house of pop topics from his glory days. I am currently 71 and my brain cells are still working just fine. With time this may not always be the case but so far so good. As far as my early years go, we did not have a lot and certainly no TV around if this is where Cliff was at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willie Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 20 minutes ago, Old guy said: I am currently 71 and my brain cells are still working just fine. With time this may not always be the case but so far so good. As far as my early years go, we did not have a lot and certainly no TV around if this is where Cliff was at. I'll help you out old guy. Google or u-tube Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old guy Posted August 7, 2017 Share Posted August 7, 2017 Thank you Willie, appreciate your kindness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMouthBilliken Posted August 8, 2017 Share Posted August 8, 2017 This joker doesn't deserve any more second chances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David King Posted August 8, 2017 Share Posted August 8, 2017 On 8/7/2017 at 9:22 AM, RiseAndGrind said: Not cool. skank hosex a nasty ass female that sleeps with anything male for drugs, money, or popularity. Most of us, in-the-know, that are paying attention, would agree that this is an apt description of Mrs. Reed. She took advantage of a relatively naïve guy; gave him two kids, and now wants to be paid. Of course, there are two sides to every story. Let's see how this plays out. On 8/7/2017 at 8:59 AM, brianstl said: At the minimum he his guilty of man handling the mother of his children. He admitted that to the police. I checked the records, and nobody in the history of Miami-Dade County has ever been convicted on a charge of "man handling". The Prosecution is going to have to come up with more than that. According to the police report "the defendant stated that he never put his hands on the victim". From past experience, I know that it is virtually impossible to "man handle" without using hands. As far as article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Coffin v. United States (1895) , and I are concerned, Willie Reed is still innocent! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hsmith19 Posted August 8, 2017 Share Posted August 8, 2017 13 minutes ago, David King said: I checked the records, and nobody in the history of Miami-Dade County has ever been convicted on a charge of "man handling". The Prosecution is going to have to come up with more than that. According to the police report "the defendant stated that he never put his hands on the victim". From past experience, I know that it is virtually impossible to "man handle" without using hands. Not sure if you're serious here, but he admitted to "touching her hair" and "grabbing her purse and shirt" in his version. But maybe he touched and grabbed with his feet instead of his hands? That is generally enough to support a misdemeanor battery charge, regardless of which appendage he used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMM28 Posted August 8, 2017 Share Posted August 8, 2017 12 minutes ago, David King said: As far as article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Coffin v. United States (1895) , and I are concerned, Willie Reed is still innocent! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NextYearBill Posted August 8, 2017 Share Posted August 8, 2017 14 minutes ago, JMM28 said: well done..... well done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David King Posted August 8, 2017 Share Posted August 8, 2017 11 hours ago, BigMouthBilliken said: This joker doesn't deserve any more second chances That's pretty presumptuous. I suppose you thought O.J. was guilty also? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorydays2013 Posted August 8, 2017 Share Posted August 8, 2017 45 minutes ago, David King said: That's pretty presumptuous. I suppose you thought O.J. was guilty also? Is that a joke? Obviously OJ was guilty lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts