Jump to content

OT: Mizzou to hire Kim


Recommended Posts

The proof is coming.

You want to play the game, call Mike Alden.

There will be a basketball game in St. Louis this year with close to 20,000 fans. SLU wont be a part of it.

I take it the proof is we're going to have a down year? Maybe... Maybe not.

As for calling Alden.... (Long pause here) This is your idea of a joke, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 319
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

And if you want to get really technical, the biggest game played in St Louis this past season involved Kentucky and Wichita St.

Also not sure why you're convinced that Mizzou/Illinois is the biggest game every year. 20,000 fans going to a NIT level matchup doesn't make it a big game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SLU, Kansas, Kentucky, Wichita St., and Kansas St. all played bigger games in St Louis than Mizzou. SLU and Wichita St played multiple games in St Louis that were far more significant than the not in tournament bragging rights game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do people realize they are arguing with one of the bigger anti-SLU trolls out there. Here are some of the things MUTGR has to say about SLU on his home board. The guy is a ****** and we'd all be better off if he's simply ignored.

http://tigerboard.com/boards/missouri-tigers.php?message=11768281

http://tigerboard.com/boards/missouri-tigers.php?message=11759027 (This post is clearly obsessive)

http://tigerboard.com/boards/missouri-tigers.php?message=11705429

http://tigerboard.com/boards/missouri-tigers.php?message=11462218

http://tigerboard.com/boards/missouri-tigers.php?message=10617602

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wrong again. SLU > MU and you know it. SLU is coached by Jim Crews, 55-14 at SLU, and has had 3 straight NCAA Tournament appearances. SLU has retaken St. Louis as the real hometown team- and you know it.

MU is coming from the failed Frank Haith Regime, hired in desperate fashion, an ignominious and historic NCAA Tournament loss 3 seasons ago to #15 seed Norfolk State, an offense that itself was offensive, and last season's NIT Not In Tournament home loss to Southern Miss of the greatly watered down C-USA. Plus, MU moved from the stronger Big XII, where it was traditionally unable to defeat Kansas, to the clearly hoops weaker SEC.

As for point 2, half that crowd is dressed in orange and blue. And frankly, we could care less. It's past time for MU to drop that silly crutch. Playing 2 games in the state's most populous metropolitan area would not be a burden. There was a time the SLU-MU game was an annual event. The all-time series stands 21-19 MU, and that's with MU winning 4 of the last 5, 3 of those 4 wins being very close games. SLU once led this series 18-17. This is hardly the "domination" that MU apologists like to spin. That record would be different had MU not chickened out on playing the game.

Thus, Duck Season continues in perpetuity in Boone County, Missouri, joined by the annual non-conference Bake Sale of assorted cupcakes. But even the Bake Sale didn't get the Tiggers into the NCAA Tournament in '14, as the Committee saw through the Haith facade.

Kansas will play in Kansas City, and the game will not involve Mizzou.

Now go and access Tigerboard where you belong.

You do realize Mizzou had 5 straight appearances prior to last season and an elite 8 as recently as 2009.

Both teams are rebuilding, but Missouri is better positioned for the future at this point.

We actually caught an unexpected break with Haith leaving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually they haven't. SLU - regression to the mean. If you want to play, call Mike Alden.

Pathetic. Asinine.

Didn't someone post a quote on a previous thread from Alden where, when asked about the possibility of playing SLU, said, "That is not something we are looking at right now." What a pretentious #####. Mizzou has this misguided sense of superiority and seems to believe that they are too good to play SLU. Oh how the tables have turned...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pathetic. Asinine.

Didn't someone post a quote on a previous thread from Alden where, when asked about the possibility of playing SLU, said, "That is not something we are looking at right now." What a pretentious #####. Mizzou has this misguided sense of superiority and seems to believe that they are too good to play SLU. Oh how the tables have turned...

Nobody goes into Vandy and beats Vandy...oh wait....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize Mizzou had 5 straight appearances prior to last season and an elite 8 as recently as 2009.

Both teams are rebuilding, but Missouri is better positioned for the future at this point.

We actually caught an unexpected break with Haith leaving.

Missouri / SLU is not and apples to apples comparison.

Missouri allows players in school to play hoops that would not last one semester at SLU (the key issue), it is a big buck state school with tons of money, in a BCS power conference that gets superior TV exposure, 25,000 students each year with nothing much else to do so they have a great fan base before and after graduation, they flood the market with journalism grads who for years promoted Missouri hoops while ridiculing SLU.

AND Missouri has avoided SLU for decades, a bunch of p*ssies; the logic being they do not want to acknowledge out existence, if they win they are supposed to win since they have all the money and low academic athletes, if they lose they lose. Go ahead, deny it.

So go away and stay away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Missouri / SLU is not and apples to apples comparison.

Missouri allows players in school that would not last one semester at SLU, it is a big buck state school with tons of money, in a BCS power conference that gets superior TV exposure, 25,000 students each year with nothing much else to do so they have a great fan base before and after graduation, they flood the market with journalism grads who for years promoted Missouri hoops while ridiculing SLU.

AND Missouri has avoided SLU for decades, a bunch of p*ssies; the logic being they do not want to acknowledge out existence, if they win they are supposed to win since they have all the money and low academic athletes, if they lose they lose. Go ahead, deny it.

So go away and stay away.

How many communication majors on SLU's bball team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many communication majors on SLU's bball team?

CheesyCow,

An honest question: when you finish posting in a thread like this and you get up and walk away from your computer, do you feel better? Is it a meaningful experience to sit here and defend your school (which I think you often make good points) on another team's message board.

I'm just not sure what you gain out of posting about this stuff on here. I have to think it's more painful than anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve how about you grow a pair and ban these two instead of letting your friend run around here unchecked

I'll bow out so you can get back to your circle jerk and leave Steve alone. :D

Good luck - we'll see if Mr. Crews can keep it up with his own recruits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do people realize they are arguing with one of the bigger anti-SLU trolls out there. Here are some of the things MUTGR has to say about SLU on his home board. The guy is a ****** and we'd all be better off if he's simply ignored.

http://tigerboard.com/boards/missouri-tigers.php?message=11768281

http://tigerboard.com/boards/missouri-tigers.php?message=11759027 (This post is clearly obsessive)

http://tigerboard.com/boards/missouri-tigers.php?message=11705429

http://tigerboard.com/boards/missouri-tigers.php?message=11462218

http://tigerboard.com/boards/missouri-tigers.php?message=10617602

I believe it had been over a year before MUTroll showed his face on here. He was nowhere to be found during this past season. I guess now that they got their native son D2 coach and have gone a couple weeks without a scandal, he feels confident enough to crawl out from under his rock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CheesyCow,

An honest question: when you finish posting in a thread like this and you get up and walk away from your computer, do you feel better? Is it a meaningful experience to sit here and defend your school (which I think you often make good points) on another team's message board.

I'm just not sure what you gain out of posting about this stuff on here. I have to think it's more painful than anything.

I like debate. This isn't the only board I go to but in general I like most of the people on here, especially the ones I've had the pleasure of meeting in person. Just because we disagree on lots of things (most notably SLU v Mizzou) doesn't mean I don't enjoy the back and forth. I also enjoy reading what other people have to say.

Suffice it to say my day isn't predicated on winning arguments on here but that doesn't mean I don't enjoy the act of doing it. Same reason people respond to me I'd guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...