Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 642
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Just now, An A-10 fan said:

They played SLU twice didn't they?

I was thinking we go to the wire with Dayton twice, have a chance at the end against Auburn on the road, but the Dukes owned us twice. And I think the Bills deserve at large consideration, so yeah, you have a point.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Littlebill said:

Uhhhhhh they played no one???? Have a brain one time for me

Littlebill,

don't think insulting me is necessary just because you disagree with my opinion.

I am trying to be respectful on this board.

 

Posted

Spiders up 9 at the under 4. That midget Dunn-Martin keeps knocking down 3s to keep them in it.

Posted

Richmond is playing much stronger against Duquesne than what Dayton did against Duquesne .

They should be no worse than an 8-9 seed at the Big Dance but they probably still need 2 more A-10 tourney wins just to get a 12-seed.

Posted

Up 12 with less than 3 to go.

Posted

Ballgame!! We’ve got to beat the Bonnies.

Posted

Good luck to your team against the Bonnies.

Lofton and Osunniyi are legit big-time players.   If they play well, SLU will have their hands full.  If they don't, the Bills should win by double-digits.

I can't complain if my Dukes finish 6th.  Sixth may be better than 4th since they would be on the opposite side of the bracket from Dayton.

But they would still be on the same side as Richmond and Rhodey

Posted
4 minutes ago, NH said:

Both of these teams will be better next year which is exciting for the A-10

A lot of teams in the A10 are going to be better and Dayton won't be so dominant. It's gonna be a fun season, and this one ain't bee chopped liver. 

Posted

I have to laugh at the Richmond fans who wanted to fire Mooney. They forget they’re just Richmond and lucky to have him. Mooney can coach.

Posted
23 minutes ago, NH said:

Richmond is really good. I’m somewhat surprised we handled them so easily.

The opposite is also true - Duquesne looked terrible, I can't believe we lost to them twice. 

Posted
Just now, NYBilliken said:

The opposite is also true - Duquesne looked terrible, I can't believe we lost to them twice. 

Duquesne was 9 for 24 from the LINE, not the 3-point line.

6th grade teams shoot better than that at the line.

With a little practice, I think I could do better than that and I haven't played basketball in over 30 years.

Posted
Just now, An A-10 fan said:

Duquesne was 9 for 24 from the LINE, not the 3-point line.

6th grade teams shoot better than that at the line.

With a little practice, I think I could do better than that and I haven't played basketball in over 30 years.

You have seen SLU shoot FTs in any game, right? 

This A-10 tournament is going to be insane. 

Posted
Just now, An A-10 fan said:

Duquesne was 9 for 24 from the LINE, not the 3-point line.

6th grade teams shoot better than that at the line.

With a little practice, I think I could do better than that and I haven't played basketball in over 30 years.

Yes, but 10 for 24 is still not good.

Posted
3 minutes ago, JettFlight5 said:

You have seen SLU shoot FTs in any game, right? 

This A-10 tournament is going to be insane. 

Yeah.  I mentioned something about SLU's woes at the line about 90 minutes ago and also said Duquesne has turned into another SLU at the line.

Your team's biggest problem is French.  He makes Shaq look good at the line.

Posted
1 minute ago, An A-10 fan said:

Yeah.  I mentioned something about SLU's woes at the line about 90 minutes ago said Duquesne has turned into another SLU at the line.

Your team's biggest problem is French.  He makes Shaq look good at the line.

In terms of shooting FTs, all of our games should say "don't try this at home". I still think the Dukes are a very tough matchup for SLU (see the two games), and there are a lot of matchups that will be very interesting next week. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, billikenbill said:

Yes, but 10 for 24 is still not good.

The ESPN Boxscore had it 9 for 24, they corrected it to 10 for 25.

Regardless, Keith Dambrot was not happy about his team's showing at the line.

He mentioned on the post-game show that everyone who shot at least 2 foul shots, were terrible.

Weathers was only 3 for 9.  That's inexcusable since most of the misses weren't even close.

Posted
28 minutes ago, An A-10 fan said:

Duquesne was 9 for 24 from the LINE, not the 3-point line.

6th grade teams shoot better than that at the line.

With a little practice, I think I could do better than that and I haven't played basketball in over 30 years.

 

26 minutes ago, billikenbill said:

Yes, but 10 for 24 is still not good.

 

7 minutes ago, An A-10 fan said:

The ESPN Boxscore had it 9 for 24, they corrected it to 10 for 25.

Regardless, Keith Dambrot was not happy about his team's showing at the line.

He mentioned on the post-game show that everyone who shot at least 2 foul shots, were terrible.

Weathers was only 3 for 9.  That's inexcusable since most of the misses weren't even close.

You're missing his point.  You said you could do better than 9/24.  Well, 10/24 is better than 9/24, but it's still not good.  Get it now?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...