Jump to content

SL Post Today: Sickening


MB73

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't know about that. I intentionally go light on you. I'd feel bad making you my ***** on the court and on Bills.com

Yeah, you are one to be feared, no doubt. Sharp as hell, too.

On the court? How about in the ring?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoa, whoa, whoa. I've never met Bizzle or Boytoy in person. We have not formed an unholy pinko alliance. Or maybe we have. We'll never say. That's how we shifty leftists operate- no names, ever-changing passwords in Baltic languages. We've been busy breaking into the P-D offices at night, replacing any unflattering pictures of our favored politicians with well-lit shots from low angles and replaced any good shots of our enemies with shots of them with eyes closed, mouths open, and ugly people in the background. Our hope is that children will be slowly influenced by our subversive tactics.

Also, see Box's post above. Huge photo and article this morning- further proof of the P-D's aggressive leftist Socialist agenda. Another sign of this Socialist agenda: calling you and other former subscribers twice a month to beg for your business back, because that's how Socialism works, per my understanding.

I knew it, I knew it, I knew it. I was going to say it, but you know I'm always trying to be careful not to offend anyone, so I kept quiet. But, I f..king knew it all along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kid, read what I write.

They put KM on today, good, so one time every once in awhile. I am referring to about 40+ years that I have observed the MU-SLU misrepresentations.

And, for the love of God, I did not ever say the sports dept. is socialist, that is something that the loons here somehow keep insiting upon... can't you distinguish?

Why would a "Socialist rag" (your words, not mine) have a non-Socialist Sports section?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, you are one to be feared, no doubt. Sharp as hell, too.

On the court? How about in the ring?

I'm confused to what you write

picking fight is wrong on Bills.com

Rings aren't for me, don't like them

Duke, doesn't fight

Duke is good, so no fight here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who are all the Mizzou alums on the Post Sports Staff(other than Gordon) that you always refer to?

I'm pretty sure Gordon is the only one, at least that writes about Mizzou, and he loves to stick his finger in the eye of Mizzou when it suits him. For those who've been around, it was Gordon who dug up dirt on Norm's Detroit connections that landed Norm in NCAA trouble in the late '80s. Gregorian similary dug through Quin's phone records to get dirt on him. Bottom line, I don't think there is any particular love for MU at the post historically. As we've learned, the post is nothing if not bandwagon jumpers. Missouri has been been getting favorable press but they are 30-4 and are a pretty compelling story. I recall when the post was singing the praises of Bruce Weber and Illinois and Chris Lowry and SIUC as well not that many hears ago - it used to drive me crazy and I know it bothered some on this board.

Burwell seems to be the biggest MU supporter right now, but I attribute that to Mizzou being 30-4 and having a black coach. If Mizzou stinks next year some of the Miami dirt sticks to Haith, they will jump off the bandwagon so fast it will make your head spin.

Or course, the post, like all papers, is becoming less and less relevant. I don't know that they have the budgets anymore to send hacks like Gordon or Gregorian out to do investigative journalism (I wish someone would dig through Bill Self's phone records, but it won't happen). I grew up on a house that received both the post and globe democrat on a daily basis (plus the wall street journal). Now I get the post on the weekend and I'm probably one of the few who does that. Sometimes I don't even read it then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, nice try, let's clarify. Last one for me on this topic, forever.

As usual, you are completely mistaken, or are spinning it back asswards, the one thing you are good at.

Sure, it was liberal for all those yrs, and thats ok, but the last 5-6 or so it went way too far, it became radical-PC-far left and last 3 it pretty much became a left wing propaganda machine, especially the front page which is supposed to be "the news". Grossly misleadiing headlines on the front page, all that, throughough the paper, perfect picturess of Dems, pictures of Repubs with eyes not aligned or pursing their lips to make them look foolish, the whole nine yards.

And the editoral staff there, what a joke. They know nothing of healthcare, but write articles that cause anger and confusion to the uninformed. To boot, they attack the SL Police dept at every opportunity, many times unfounded, with, of course, misleading headlines. Editorial cartoonist Matson is 99% radical far left, ridicules the GOP every time. Palin with pig snout-cheeks-lipstick.

Enough.

At no time did I imply that the sports dept is socialist, another mis-read and/or spin by the bizzleboy-moytoy-pistol alliance. I just point that they have intentionally minimized, even disrespected SLU and favored Missouri U for various reasons all of these years.

Sure, out of habit, I kept having it delivered, drink some coffee in the am, read the sports page, but finally I decided I would not subisdize their agena, even though it is not a big expense.

Ha, now they call me every 2 weeks with deals, "a couple of free months" resubscription offers.

They do not get it. They are failing. Bankrupt parent company, SL staff has been decimated. Why? Try to think.

(again, great food/restaurant dept... but I think they sell only 120,000 day in a 3.5M metropolitan market. Only paper in town. Yes, I know the internet rules, but...)

OK, so it only takes you 5-6 years to realize that you don't want to pay for something that you can't stand? Well, at least you aren't as slow as I made you out to be initially. I can just imagine the conversation you had with the wife the last few years when the subscription renewal came in:

Wife: Honey, the Post-Dispatch subscription renewal just came in...do you want to keep getting it?

MB73: What?!?! That commie, pinko, leftist, socialist rag! GRRRRRR....that paper makes me soooooooo angry! I threw my coffee at the kitchen wall the other morning when I read some liberal tripe in the editorial section. I want Bill McClellan to die a horrible death! And when I went to the sports section yesterday, they didn't even have the SLU baseball scores posted. I can't stand that paper! I want to throw something now!

Wife: So I should just tell them we are cancelling? Got it.

MB73: When did I say to cancel it? Renew our subscription and make sure we continue to get both the daily and Sunday editions.

And I highly doubt that this will be your last post on this topic, forever. Maybe we can place a bet? Fifty gajillion large, perhaps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoa, whoa, whoa. I've never met Bizzle or Boytoy in person. We have not formed an unholy pinko alliance. Or maybe we have. We'll never say. That's how we shifty leftists operate- no names, ever-changing passwords in Baltic languages. We've been busy breaking into the P-D offices at night, replacing any unflattering pictures of our favored politicians with well-lit shots from low angles and replaced any good shots of our enemies with shots of them with eyes closed, mouths open, and ugly people in the background. Our hope is that children will be slowly influenced by our subversive tactics.

Well, I'm glad you're finally taking credit for the lipstick on Palin the pig. That was a job well done and there was no need to keep it hush hush this long. I blame your silence on the fact that you're a foo-foo liberal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would a "Socialist rag" (your words, not mine) have a non-Socialist Sports section?

Your logic escapes me, sports is unrelated to political agenda.

Internet tough guy.

Yeah, I know, I know. We shall see. He called me a *****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL. When he was responding to roy? Sweet reading comprehension.

That is the funniest part of all! Skip was just joking around with Roy and MB threatens to fight him! MB73, the title of Most Awesome Poster Ever is bestowed upon you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL. When he was responding to roy? Sweet reading comprehension.

Did I misunderstand? I thought he wanted to get me a ring. I was flattered, but really not interested. I don't see the problem with gay marriage, I just don't want to be a participant.

Well, I surely don't feel as good about myself now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the funniest part of all! Skip was just joking around with Roy and MB threatens to fight him! MB73, the title of Most Awesome Poster Ever is bestowed upon you.

Wouldn't that be Most Awesomest Poster Ever.

F,,,king Liberals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this skip calling me his "*****" on and off the court is very open to debate. skip with his convienent memory only remembers the last few steps of a play years ago where right after i had stripped him of the ball and was heading in for a slam, he fouls me from behind which caused me to throw the ball in the attempt to get the nba "continuation call" over the backboard. of course in typical huff and puff unwritten rules, the foul has to be called by the fouler not the foulee, and wouldnt you know it, the coward skip, acted like it was clean. my a$$. it was a foul for the ages. his team ended up winning the game in the "win by two up to 11" guidelines, 14 - 12. had that foul been called the game would have been won by the good guys in regulation 11-9.

the only "*****" is skip. no foul calling bastard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm hoping after the telling of that legendary playground story, mb agrees to kick skip's ass for that as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this skip calling me his "*****" on and off the court is very open to debate. skip with his convienent memory only remembers the last few steps of a play years ago where right after i had stripped him of the ball and was heading in for a slam, he fouls me from behind which caused me to throw the ball in the attempt to get the nba "continuation call" over the backboard. of course in typical huff and puff unwritten rules, the foul has to be called by the fouler not the foulee, and wouldnt you know it, the coward skip, acted like it was clean. my a$$. it was a foul for the ages. his team ended up winning the game in the "win by two up to 11" guidelines, 14 - 12. had that foul been called the game would have been won by the good guys in regulation 11-9.

the only "*****" is skip. no foul calling bastard.

And those bastards at the PD didn't have a story on this?? Commies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would a "Socialist rag" (your words, not mine) have a non-Socialist Sports section?

OH they most certainly DO have a Socialist sports page!! Have you ever noticed how much the Cincinnati REDS get mentioned every bleepin' summer?? Why would a SAINT LOUIS paper EVER have anything about the REDS in it??? Pinko, commie rag....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this skip calling me his "*****" on and off the court is very open to debate. skip with his convienent memory only remembers the last few steps of a play years ago where right after i had stripped him of the ball and was heading in for a slam, he fouls me from behind which caused me to throw the ball in the attempt to get the nba "continuation call" over the backboard. of course in typical huff and puff unwritten rules, the foul has to be called by the fouler not the foulee, and wouldnt you know it, the coward skip, acted like it was clean. my a$$. it was a foul for the ages. his team ended up winning the game in the "win by two up to 11" guidelines, 14 - 12. had that foul been called the game would have been won by the good guys in regulation 11-9.

the only "*****" is skip. no foul calling bastard.

This part makes me laugh the hardest. Just trying to imagine Roy rearing back and going in for a tomahawk slam like he's DWade illicits non-stop chuckles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This part makes me laugh the hardest. Just trying to imagine Roy rearing back and going in for a tomahawk slam like he's DWade illicits non-stop chuckles.

Im pretty sure it went something like this.

Roy being Billy Holyle of course

[media]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...