Jump to content

TheA_Bomb

Billikens.com Donor
  • Posts

    8,600
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

Posts posted by TheA_Bomb

  1. On 4/7/2024 at 9:13 AM, slu72 said:

    If true about JS signing for $2mm and 6 years and succeeds as expected SLU will get a hefty buyout if he leaves after 2-3 years. No idea if it would be equal to his salary times years left, but even if it’s at half salary that’s still a nice chunk of cash. 

    Total WAG but we got 3 years.  In that time will SLU be elevated enough to grab a successful Drake Coach? McCollum sitting right there waiting to come back to his home state. 

     

    In the Eye on College Basketball Podcast (I mentioned previously), Parrish and Norlander also assert they believe SLU is right for the Big East. They list good facilities (newer arena) and natural recruiting base as reasons.  It was great to hear two of the top CBB reporters make the case. 

    BuiltFordBills likes this
  2. Coach Schertz System or how I learned to stop worrying and love the long bomb.

    This video is a good breakdown of why the system is superior based on Points Points per Possession Triple P not to be confused with Double P.  ISU was #13 on KenPom Adj Off. #1?  That would be National Champion UCONN. #2? That's Final 4 Alabama.  So that's a good metric to measure good teams.  Think of it like this if you take 3, 3 point shots and hit 1 you're at 1ppp. 

    ISU PPP was ranked #7 at 1.159 according to https://www.teamrankings.com/ncaa-basketball/stat/offensive-efficiency

    Here's the video: 

    https://youtu.be/EvL8VVphT2M?si=jZrSiPPDEQRY7b16

  3. 25 minutes ago, billiken_roy said:

    not just building a roster with sheer talent.   looking for chemistry.  

    Exactly we need guys that are culture fits, if Avila knows him and likes his work ethic.  Or a coach is familiar that matters.  Can't be a C. Gordon with all the talent but a malcontent.

    We need guys willing to buy into a system, share the ball and play hard.

    billiken_roy likes this
  4. 20 minutes ago, billiken_roy said:

    I personally think with the Schertz offense I watched in the NIT, we don't need a pure point guard.   They get out and run and everyone is moving even in the half court.   

    Assuming Schertz will try to implement the same offense we need speed and shooters.   A lot of dribbling is a fail.  All need vision and passing skills and unselfish attitudes.  

    Yeah I agree with this but does anyone on the team currently have + ball handling skills? 

    We mentioned beating the press as a reason for a PG. It's best to beat a press with passing.  But sometimes especially late game situations you need someone with traditional PG skills. 

    Maybe Coach thinks we have enough.  I'm unsure.  I'd think we need 1 or 2 PGs.  Then more front court players.

  5. Portal ranking is tough and so new.  Personally I think 247sports does the best portal coverage. 

    https://247sports.com/season/2024-basketball/transferportal/

    Regardless, of the ranking nice to see SLU getting top rated talent. It'll translate to some publicity and top 25 mentions. 

    Also nice to see logical roster construction not last minute take what you can get, then surprise when no one is cleared to play.

  6. 1 hour ago, 3star_recruit said:

    I think the addition of two rather than four returning starters extends the honeymoon period for Coach Schertz.  Four returning starters plus Jimerson is a preseason top 25 team because of all the known factors. Expectations by local and national media would be through the roof.

    Two returning starters starters plus Jimerson plus a couple of solid pieces from the portal is a team that will be projected as top four in the A10 by the preseason outlets.  Two very different situations.  

    Good point. I was thinking this is a NCAA team with 4 ISU starters and Jimmerson.  Now I don't know yet.  Going to depend on the quality of the transfers. Even then will they have chemistry.

  7. 1 hour ago, 3star_recruit said:

    I have.  A handful of mid-majors have struck gold.  Everybody else has been struggling in vain.  Now we've finally reached the point where the big boys officially kick us out of the club.

    The last sentence is an assumption and not a fact.  If it comes true it is more applicable to football.

    We don't really know.  SLU hasn't exactly been tearing it up since 1948 before NIL was a thing. So what are we really losing? But we need to find a way to be positioned for what's to come.  College Basketball isn't going away. There will be CBB competition in some form.

    For the many posters that don't like NIL and all the money, maybe getting "kicked out of the club" gives them what they want.  Sports without the influence of big money. 

    I personally want SLU to compete at the highest level it can.  So I'm accepting of the changes and willing to look for ways to exploit the opportunity. If the ACC goes away there's some likely shifts that bring opportunities.

  8. 58 minutes ago, 3star_recruit said:

    I'd estimate that less than 10% of D1 programs are defined by the greatness of their sports teams.  So that 10% should define how the other 90% operate?

    Guess you haven't had ESPN for the last 30 years.

    Big schools, conferences were already driving everything, NIL or not.

  9. 2 hours ago, cgeldmacher said:

    I think it is either going to be that, or the government will step in and finally divorce college sports from the big business it has become.  I understand that universities have made millions on these kids for years (men's football and basketball only).  I also understand the argument that the kids should benefit from the millions being made off of them.  However, there is another argument that his just as logical as this argument and it is that universities are for students who want to receive an education.  That's all.  If you really take a step back and see the forest for the trees, it makes about as much sense for universities to be involved in professional sports as it does our national parks or trade unions to be involved in professional sports.  By that, I mean it makes no sense.  People in Europe can't comprehend why our universities are so involved in sports and, they are the ones that are right, not us.

    When college sports started, it was literally guys who agreed to go to the same university for purely academic reasons creating club teams for their spare time.  That turned into organized teams.  That turned into organized conferences.  That turned into TV deal and national championships.  That turned into schools creating sham classes so those kids can go to school and play for the school's team.  That turned into kids getting paid now to pretend they are students so that they can represent the school's team.

    If it were up to me, I would have Congress pass a law that essentially accomplishes the following: If you want to be a professional athlete then go pro.  If you want to go to college and play sports, you have to understand that you will not benefit from that situation other than having your tuition paid for and room and board.  Then, you have to go to real classes, study, and stay academically eligible.  You can't go pro for four years after agreeing to go to college.  That will bring the talent level down in football and basketball.  It will not lower the passion that fans have for their teams one bit.

    I know I sound like an old guy, probably because I sort of am, but that is what I would like to see.  I'm not saying to go back to what it was when I was growing up in the 80's and 90's.  I'm saying take it back further than that.

    This is kinda how they do things in the People's Republic of China the government tells citizens where they have to go and how much money they can make.

    I googled "fear of change" this is what it returned: 

    "AI overviews are experimental. Learn more

    The fear of change is called metathesiophobia, and it's an extreme version of the basic survival instinct to stick to what you know. It can cause severe anxiety or panic attacks, and can become a debilitating fear that prevents people from making changes in their lives. Metathesiophobia can also cause:

    Self-doubt

    Lack of self-esteem

    Social anxiety

    Depression

    Inability to adapt to new situations

    Isolation

    Inability to make decisions

    Failure to consider options

    Defining identity by external things

    Dependence on possessions 

    Here are some ways to overcome the fear of change:

    Reframe the experience: Be more present with the experience as it is, and experience it to its fullest instead of worrying about it changing

    Practice repetition: Train your brain to follow a path of positive feedback

     rather than a negative feedback loop

    Write down the pros and cons: Encourage clients to write down the pros and cons of making change."

×
×
  • Create New...