TheA_Bomb

They have a quality road win over X. Maybe that's factoring in. They also beat McNeese and Nevada both top 100. It'll be our first real test.

12 is good, there's always a bunch of 12-5 upsets. 11-6 and 12-5s are the most common.

Interesting.......where did we hear that before? Thanks for the tid bit H-bot.

Perhaps, but you could just cut and paste my comment to their board.

If the 12 quad 1 and 2 games (counting the KenPom A and B rated games as quad 1 and 2) hold for the remainder of the season, assuming those 6 losses are in those games that's 6-6 vs the only good competition we play. I worry that's not enough. Need to be over .500 in the good games Quad 1 & 2 and no bad losses. Or way over .500 in those games with maybe 1 bad (quad 3, maybe 4) loss. It's early, as the Wiz points out 8 or 9 games in is when the #s stop relying on projections and have more results. So we have 5 more games in that time we get 3 decent teams SCU, Loy Marymount and USF. A little off topic you see that Bama schedule? It's a crazy stretch of games: St. Johns, Purdue, Ill, Zags, UNLV, Clemson, UTSA, Zona, and USF.

I think 27-3 gets us dancing. Maybe 26-4. KenPom has 10 B rated games and 2 A rated games on our schedule. Which, I think, are equivalent to quad 1 and 2 games. If we go 9-3 or 8-4 in those and blow out everyone else we should be alright. Just speculation on my part based on listening to bracketologists breakdown previous fields. Cut and paste. I'm very shocked.

Yeah seriously and you seem really dedicated to the cause.

I do appreciate that these posters seem so concerned that I might be unhappy. Message board empaths. Billikens win over the first actual team on their schedule and avenge a loss from last year. I hope GCU is actually good. I'm not quite sure yet. One more before what looks like a real test, SCU, is looking legit. They have played a couple tougher opponents and are undefeated.

More like winning efficiently against all the tomato cans on the schedule, keep up.

It's a call back to a very old message board burn. You wouldn't understand, kinda like the NET, it's complicated.

Let me know when you turn in enough aluminum cans to afford a Grammarly account.

Hey, thanks, Lee Greenwood. What's your stance on grown men (maybe grown men but probably not) that use emojis? I bet @laker119 holds his coffee mug with both hands.

Bro you don't know how ignore works.

Yes, it's a loser mindset because you don't understand what it takes and are advocating for something that inevitably leads to failure. But you're not the coach, so the impact on the team is negligible. You're just annoying and naive. It was not thoroughly dominating. Thoroughly dominating would've closed out the game cleanly and maintained the larger margin of victory.