xfactor9600 Posted May 8, 2007 Share Posted May 8, 2007 HOME: Tennessee, Cincinnati, Creighton, Belmont, Deleware State ROAD: Miami (OH), Arizona State, Virginia, Auburn NEUTRAL: K-State (U.S. Bank), Kent State (Chicago tourney), and then with a win Indiana (Chicago tourney) I realize most won't care, but I know I've had a discussion with a few people about A-10 OOC scheduling. What do you guys think? I think it will definitely help the conference RPI and SOS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STLfan Posted May 8, 2007 Share Posted May 8, 2007 Looks like a good schedule. I hope more teams in the A10 can get schedules like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bay Area Billiken Posted May 8, 2007 Share Posted May 8, 2007 That looks like a very strong schedule for X. It should help X's RPI, as well as the A-10 opponents' RPI's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slu72 Posted May 8, 2007 Share Posted May 8, 2007 Can't argue with it...we'd take it am sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kshoe Posted May 8, 2007 Share Posted May 8, 2007 Very tough. It will certainly help Xavier's RPI, assuming you win a fair share of them. Unless you win an ungodly number of those game though it won't be a huge help for the RPI of the other teams in the A-10. In fact, if you scheduled too tough and lose a bunch of those it will actually hurt us as we'll be playing a roughly .500 Xavier team rather than a Xavier team with a much higher winning %. I'm not saying you shouldn't schedule hard, because you absolutely should, but it is a mathematical truth that if this difficult schedule significiantly impacts X's W/L % then it will hurt the rest of the conference. That being said, just win baby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 1 Posted May 8, 2007 Share Posted May 8, 2007 I had said earlier I hope we have a stronger home schedule...Billiken Roy responded he was happy with our past schedule naming some of the top teams we played...What I meantwas I do not want to go down and see teams like Quincy, Truman State,UMSL, Western Illinois, etc...We should schedule stronger team than that even in the beginning of the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pistol Posted May 8, 2007 Share Posted May 8, 2007 I love it, and would be thrilled if SLU could put together a schedule like that every year. This past year was solid, and I want to see a tough one season after season with no RPI killers. There's no question that XU is doing their part to strengthen the conference in terms of scheduling and RPI. Now of course we get screwed and will only play them once in a move that makes no sense whatsoever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billiken_roy Posted May 8, 2007 Share Posted May 8, 2007 big al, last year we had fewer "buy games" than i past years and one of last year's buy games, quincy, had zero impact on the rpi. i agree i would gladly not have any buy games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slufanskip Posted May 9, 2007 Share Posted May 9, 2007 that should give you one of the top non conf rpi's in the country. Do well in the A10 and win a large percentage of those and you should be looking for a good seed in the tourney. Official Billikens.com sponsor of H Waldman Official Sponser of the Stemmler and Ahearn could and would have helped club. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xfactor9600 Posted May 9, 2007 Author Share Posted May 9, 2007 The key, as some have pointed out, is to win these OOC games, now that they're scheduled. X has a pretty good team coming back, and they don't have to play SLU more than once during the conference season (which by the way is a travesty). It's too early to project how many wins, but I'm hopeful of a good OOC record. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pistol Posted May 9, 2007 Share Posted May 9, 2007 True, you have to win a few of those, but I'd rather play a monster non-con schedule and take some losses while gaining the good experience for my players before heading into conference play. It makes for a much tougher and more tournament-ready team. So many times we've seen teams like UC under Huggins go 12-1 in non-conference play, wear out over the course of the conference season, and flop early in the tournament. Players and teams don't get any better by playing cupcakes, so I'd rather have a few losses to good teams than pointless wins over bad teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.