Jump to content

Field Hockey @ La Salle Abandoned Due to Nearby Gunfire


Recommended Posts

The degree of luck involved in the fact that no one present at t he game was hit by a bullet or  ricochet is huge, considering an audible level of firing that sounded like a corn popper in use. There was a sudden blast of fire and then very little. Maybe one of the contending groups achieved its purpose and stopped firing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

My wife was searching for news from Philadelphia to see if she could find local news about this event. What she found was someone talking about Temple University reporting a significant burst of gunfire next to their campus which forced the evacuation of players an all other people present in one of their sports playing fields. No injuries or casualties were reported by Temple U. 

Interesting, LaSalle may have arrangements with Temple for using some of Temple's playing fields for holding their sports events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In looking at a map of that area, any shots that weren’t stopped by hitting the bleachers would have been headed directly towards a residential area. This could have been so much worse.

 

Edit: I went to the LaSalle website, they have nothing posted about this, just the box score and that’s it. A10 is also silent on it.

Edited by Lord Elrond
Additional information
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do a google earth search on the area.  How were the shots fired from the KFC parking lot?

4 lanes of traffic, a huge parking lot, a Mcdonalds are all in between the KFC and the Temple Field.  Hard to believe they were shot from over there unless the shooter was on the roof of the KFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, thetorch said:

Do a google earth search on the area.  How were the shots fired from the KFC parking lot?

4 lanes of traffic, a huge parking lot, a Mcdonalds are all in between the KFC and the Temple Field.  Hard to believe they were shot from over there unless the shooter was on the roof of the KFC.

Are you saying you believe that the shooter was closer?

Screen Shot 2024-09-28 at 7.20.03 PM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, billikenfan05 said:

Are you saying you believe that the shooter was closer?

Screen Shot 2024-09-28 at 7.20.03 PM.png

Almost certainly was.

What were they shooting at?

Bullets had to go through 4 lanes of busy traffic, a busy parking lot, another 2 lanes of traffic and another parking lot to get to the field. Its possible but unlikely. Long way for stray bullets to travel in a crowded urban area.

Players clearly heard lots of loud shots, again over heavy traffic, multiple buildings in the way. Seems unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, thetorch said:

Almost certainly was.

What were they shooting at?

Bullets had to go through 4 lanes of busy traffic, a busy parking lot, another 2 lanes of traffic and another parking lot to get to the field. Its possible but unlikely. Long way for stray bullets to travel in a crowded urban area.

Players clearly heard lots of loud shots, again over heavy traffic, multiple buildings in the way. Seems unlikely.

Thanks. I do believe the shooter moved closer to the field. The second burst was noticeably louder in the second video. Only thing I saw was "Officials say a man wearing a black hoodie was firing a weapon in the Kentucky Fried Chicken parking lot, but fled the scene before police arrived." which makes it sounds like some dude firing off random rounds. I really don't know where he was located, but I know that I can hear bullets whizzing by and pinging off metal. iPhone microphones are good but those shots sounded feet away if not closer. I do find it odd that every report seems to do it's best to make it sound further away than it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a vast difference between effective range and total range of a pistol cartridge. The most common cartridge in use is 9 mm, which is used by the US Army, NATO and countless police departments and by civilians, including those engaged in criminal activities. The maximum effective range is how far you can hit and incapacitate or kill your target, for a 9mm gun this is between 50 yards, and for highly trained people it can go up to 100 yards (football field size). The training is required to hit your target, it does not mean the bullet cannot hit and kill someone you are not aiming at. However effective range is not the full reach of the 9mm cartridge which can reach up 2400 yards. This does not mean it can kill up to 2400 yards away, but certainly some 9 mm cartridges can kill innocent people up to maximum range of 133 yards. The capacity to do this requires a target hit at or above 260 ft/lb. Beyond that distance, the impact of a 9 mm bullet may cause wounds until the bullet becomes "spent" and gradually loses its capacity to penetrate clothing and skin. This is applicable to 9 mm pistols folks, not to rifle ammo. The bullets shot at the KFC could certainly have reached the Temple U playing field.

Try this for information   https://www.ammoman.com/blog/9mm-effective-range/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, billikenfan05 said:

Image

Nice statement.  But not to be a jerk, but why are they okay with claiming a 1-0 victory in a game that they were hosting that was significantly shortened by a mass shooter?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OkieBilliken said:

Nice statement.  But not to be a jerk, but why are they okay with claiming a 1-0 victory in a game that they were hosting that was significantly shortened by a mass shooter?  

It's an odd statement. Because it feels like it's directed at La Salle Athletics and University administration as much as it's about gun violence and gun laws. It feels like La Salle Field Hockey went out on their own to draft this statement. But yes, if the statement is made toward La Salle then it feels like they are talking out of both sides of their mouth. They are okay with taking the win, but also we went through a tragedy/traumatic event. Certainly the former is true and should be given proper coverage. 

OkieBilliken likes this
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I  had read (the day after the incident) that the NCAA considers a game complete if at least 48 minutes have been played. Not sure how much time was left in the game in question, but they play 15 minute quarters.

Wanted to see if there's a box score of the game, but the AD's website seems to be down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, White Pelican said:

I  had read (the day after the incident) that the NCAA considers a game complete if at least 48 minutes have been played. Not sure how much time was left in the game in question, but they play 15 minute quarters.

Wanted to see if there's a box score of the game, but the AD's website seems to be down.

There was 10 minutes and change left. So yeah by that NCAA rule, it's correct. It feels like dirty pool to claim that win given the events that caused the abandonment, especially when it could be argued that they failed to provide a safe facility for play. 

 

At the end of the day in the grand scheme the result doesn't matter other than everyone escaped with their lives. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the box score from Lasalle. Can someone explain it? This is showing 2 overtimes and 110 minutes for one goalkeeper and only 95 for the other. Can someone explain this please? I know absolutely nothing about field hockey.

https://goexplorers.com/field-hockey/2024/boxscore/vs-saint-louis-university/11603/pdf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, White Pelican said:

Here's the box score from Lasalle. Can someone explain it? This is showing 2 overtimes and 110 minutes for one goalkeeper and only 95 for the other. Can someone explain this please? I know absolutely nothing about field hockey.

https://goexplorers.com/field-hockey/2024/boxscore/vs-saint-louis-university/11603/pdf

 

That is so weird. I am almost certain this game did not go to OT. 

OkieBilliken likes this
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bill's website is down or I'd look there. Yeah, it shows 2 halves and then 2 ot's. It almost looks like a template for a soccer box score.

Edit: looking at my phone, the box score is the same on the Bill's website. I don't understand how the timing works. I read that they normally play four 15 minute quarters but I don't get where the triple digit times come in. As I said, I know next to nothing about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, White Pelican said:

The Bill's website is down or I'd look there. Yeah, it shows 2 halves and then 2 ot's. It almost looks like a template for a soccer box score.

 

The website is up for me. 

The game started at 2pm CT. I picked up the game live late in the first half. Looking back at my recent calls, I dialed out at 3:28pm to tell someone what I just saw. There is no freakin' way that game made it to OT in less than 90 minutes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The site is working on my phone but not on my laptop.  Never had this problem before. University (school) site itself works though.

EDIT: The Bill's box score is identical. I don't understand how they keep time I guess. I thought they played four 15 minute quarters but I'm seeing 110 minutes and change on the box score.

Edited by White Pelican
More info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OkieBilliken said:

That game DID NOT go into overtime.  It was shortened.   That is the most bizarre boxscore I have ever read.    Maybe they kept the clock running when everyone was running for their lives.  

I just looked at a SLU home game result. The box score shows 4 quarters, nothing about OT. Is Lasalle so cheap they used a soccer box score? That's what it looks like to me. But I can't explain the weird timings either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, billikenfan05 said:

It's an odd statement. Because it feels like it's directed at La Salle Athletics and University administration as much as it's about gun violence and gun laws. It feels like La Salle Field Hockey went out on their own to draft this statement. But yes, if the statement is made toward La Salle then it feels like they are talking out of both sides of their mouth. They are okay with taking the win, but also we went through a tragedy/traumatic event. Certainly the former is true and should be given proper coverage. 

I think that’s right, it sure felt to me that LaSalle administration wanted to just sweep this under the rug, and the team didn’t like that and were calling their university out. Personally I care more that no one was injured than I do about who won the game. I certainly don’t care enough about the outcome of the game to send our team back there. Looking at the schedule, LaSalle is on the road to Richmond and Longwood this weekend. HOWEVER, at this time, their next home game is scheduled for next week at Temple’s  stadium, the same shooting range of last week’s game, as are all their remaining home games.  It could be they are just trying to get the location changed. I don’t understand why the LaSalle AD hasn’t found another field to play the rest of the season on, that seems like a minimum response to this.  I cannot imagine sending the team back there, talk about sending a message that you don’t care about your student athletes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Lord Elrond said:

I think that’s right, it sure felt to me that LaSalle administration wanted to just sweep this under the rug, and the team didn’t like that and were calling their university out. Personally I care more that no one was injured than I do about who won the game. I certainly don’t care enough about the outcome of the game to send our team back there. Looking at the schedule, LaSalle is on the road to Richmond and Longwood this weekend. HOWEVER, at this time, their next home game is scheduled for next week at Temple’s  stadium, the same shooting range of last week’s game, as are all their remaining home games.  It could be they are just trying to get the location changed. I don’t understand why the LaSalle AD hasn’t found another field to play the rest of the season on, that seems like a minimum response to this.  I cannot imagine sending the team back there, talk about sending a message that you don’t care about your student athletes.

This could be a signal that they don’t believe that La Salle is looking to move venues. But that’s purely speculation.

I can’t believe Temple played there the next day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...