DirtyRican Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I may have missed this but is there any official word if we will be seeing Mr. Eillis Saturday? It seems like there have been a few different reports and feelings but nothing concrete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BACKHANDtheRICAN Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I may have missed this but is there any official word if we will be seeing Mr. Eillis Saturday? It seems like there have been a few different reports and feelings but nothing concrete. CE told me that he was playing on Saturday. 20 & 12 with 4 assists, 4 blocks, & 1 forearm shiver Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOSLU68 Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 CE told me that he was playing on Saturday. 20 & 12 with 4 assists, 4 blocks, & 1 forearm shiver I would be surprised if we have two Conklins on the team although he will come in within an inch and 10 pounds of Conklin I would really like it if we had two enforcers; but when people start talking about bigs hitting the three I don't dream of bangers on the boards-Australian or not. For that matter CS is not as fiesty as Lisch was Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BACKHANDtheRICAN Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I would be surprised if we have to Conklins on the team although he will come in within an inch and 10 pounds of Conklin I would really like it if we had two enforcers; but when people start talking about bigs hitting the three I don't dream of bangers on the boards-Australian or not. For that matter CS is not as fiesty as Lisch was Fleshy=Enforcer.... right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quality Is Job 1 Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I would be surprised if we have to Conklins on the team although he will come in within an inch and 10 pounds of Conklin I would really like it if we had two enforcers; but when people start talking about bigs hitting the three I don't dream of bangers on the boards-Australian or not. For that matter CS is not as fiesty as Lisch was Bill Laimbeer was an enforcer who knocked down perimeter shots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doowop Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Bill Laimbeer was an enforcer who knocked down perimeter shots.So is Harangody. --- Also, no one should expext CE to score in double figures within the first month or so unless RM simplifies his offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clock_Tower Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Speaking of CE, my source says that CE, probably b/c of the long flight, now measures 6'6" according to RM's yardstick. I guess now we all should be patient with CE since he is now an undersized 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOSLU68 Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Bill Laimbeer was an enforcer who knocked down perimeter shots. too fleshy for RM"s purposes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGB91 Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 too fleshy for RM"s purposes RM should be an expert on "fleshy" bodies if anyone should be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archy McNally Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Speaking of CE, my source says that CE, probably b/c of the long flight, now measures 6'6" according to RM's yardstick. I guess now we all should be patient with CE since he is now an undersized 4. Not surprising. RM and the assistants kept saying how he was a 6-8 shooter, legit PF size with the ability to score. Now they list him at 6-6? It can be ruled as fact. RM is shrinking the players size. The next time someone says BC is undersized, I shall point out that the listed height is on the short a couple inches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archy McNally Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 RM is shrinking the players size. Maybe I should have said, "shrinking the players heights". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clock_Tower Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Maybe I should have said, "shrinking the players heights". I nearly typed the same myself!! Seriously, though, CE's height is still listed as 6'8" and with him weighing 240 lbs according to SLU's roster on the team's webpage. It has not changed - yet. Guess we'll see tomorrow if CE is really only 1 inch shorter than WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westy03 Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 I nearly typed the same myself!! Seriously, though, CE's height is still listed as 6'8" and with him weighing 240 lbs according to SLU's roster on the team's webpage. It has not changed - yet. Guess we'll see tomorrow if CE is really only 1 inch shorter than WR.Looks like he is playing Saturday according to TT. When I saw him at the Billiken Club meeting I would say he is 6'6 230. He was shorter then Remeken and about the same height as John Smith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtyRican Posted January 8, 2010 Author Share Posted January 8, 2010 Hooray for Ellis and hooray for school Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SShoe Posted January 8, 2010 Share Posted January 8, 2010 Looks like he is playing Saturday according to TT. When I saw him at the Billiken Club meeting I would say he is 6'6 230. He was shorter then Remeken and about the same height as John SmithTT's article also said that Reid was returning to St. Louis. That's good news. I really hope he can return and play, although probably not this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOSLU68 Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 TT's article also said that Reid was returning to St. Louis. That's good news. I really hope he can return and play, although probably not this year. my wife said RM was on Channel 5 saying Cody would redshirt-evidently not in playing shape-that will give him 4 plus years to get his academics on a path that does not lead to Lindenwood-not that there is anything wrong with that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawk Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 my wife said RM was on Channel 5 saying Cody would redshirt-evidently not in playing shape-that will give him 4 plus years to get his academics on a path that does not lead to Lindenwood-not that there is anything wrong with that Interesting. B/c TT just said the opposite. http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/billiken-...o-for-saturday/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidlee Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 my wife said RM was on Channel 5 saying Cody would redshirt-evidently not in playing shape-that will give him 4 plus years to get his academics on a path that does not lead to Lindenwood-not that there is anything wrong with that I was listening to 5 and I thought RM suggested that he redshirt but Frank said at the end of broadcast that Ellis stated after practice that he would NOT redshirt. Did anyone hear the same thing or did I just miss something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOSLU68 Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 I was listening to 5 and I thought RM suggested that he redshirt but Frank said at the end of broadcast that Ellis stated after practice that he would NOT redshirt. Did anyone hear the same thing or did I just miss something? I love it my wife was wrong; if that wasn't enough Frank C on Channel 5 says both KM and CE will play tomorrow and RM looked thinner on TV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgcurtin Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 I love it my wife was wrong; if that wasn't enough Frank C on Channel 5 says both KM and CE will play tomorrow and RM looked thinner on TV You better call the TV repair man or see your opthomologist immediately. Something is definitely affecting your picture or your vision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doowop Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 I love it my wife was wrong; if that wasn't enough Frank C on Channel 5 says both KM and CE will play tomorrow and RM looked thinner on TV Was there some reason that KM would not play? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.