xfactor9600 Posted April 18, 2008 Share Posted April 18, 2008 Conference ATLANTIC 10 BASKETBALL Income NCAA tournaments $3,892,500 Atlantic 10 basketball tournaments $1,520,400 Television and advertising $963,600 Sponsorships $562,400 Dividend income $119,500 Expenses Conference revenue sharing $1,969,900 Championship administration $1,647,900 Conference revenue sharing – member dues $1,500,000 Salaries, payroll taxes, benefits $1,193,400 Television and advertising costs $987,200 NCAA student opportunity assistance $635,200 NCAA student special assistance $391,500 Meetings/convention/travel $341,900 Sponsorship commissions/expenses $275,200 Officials bureau $197,600 Rent and utilities $129,800 Revenuesplit Xavier $500,917 St. Joseph’s $469,960 Temple $392,094 George Washington $290,210 Dayton $286,887 Richmond $215,840 LaSalle $203,114 Charlotte $194,221 Massachusetts $185,481 St. Bonaventure $184,425 Rhode Island $176,845 Duquesne $157,711 Fordham $145,042 Saint Louis $67,161 Total $3,469,908 Average $247,851 CommissionerComp Linda Bruno Compensation $291,792 Benefit plans and deferred compensation $29,179 Expense account/other allowances $9,000 Total $329,971 http://blog.al.com/bn/2008/02/show_m...=4414679837135 Why is SLU only getting 67k? we were curious about that over at Xavierhoops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbofive Posted April 18, 2008 Share Posted April 18, 2008 Conference ATLANTIC 10 BASKETBALL Income NCAA tournaments $3,892,500 Atlantic 10 basketball tournaments $1,520,400 Television and advertising $963,600 Sponsorships $562,400 Dividend income $119,500 Expenses Conference revenue sharing $1,969,900 Championship administration $1,647,900 Conference revenue sharing – member dues $1,500,000 Salaries, payroll taxes, benefits $1,193,400 Television and advertising costs $987,200 NCAA student opportunity assistance $635,200 NCAA student special assistance $391,500 Meetings/convention/travel $341,900 Sponsorship commissions/expenses $275,200 Officials bureau $197,600 Rent and utilities $129,800 Revenuesplit Xavier $500,917 St. Joseph’s $469,960 Temple $392,094 George Washington $290,210 Dayton $286,887 Richmond $215,840 LaSalle $203,114 Charlotte $194,221 Massachusetts $185,481 St. Bonaventure $184,425 Rhode Island $176,845 Duquesne $157,711 Fordham $145,042 Saint Louis $67,161 Total $3,469,908 Average $247,851 CommissionerComp Linda Bruno Compensation $291,792 Benefit plans and deferred compensation $29,179 Expense account/other allowances $9,000 Total $329,971 http://blog.al.com/bn/2008/02/show_m...=4414679837135 Why is SLU only getting 67k? we were curious about that over at Xavierhoops. NKOTB, i'd suppose... we'll get there, step by step. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pistol Posted April 18, 2008 Share Posted April 18, 2008 NKOTB, i'd suppose... we'll get there, step by step. Then why does Charlotte get 3X what we do? This is a good question, xfactor. I have no idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xfactor9600 Posted April 18, 2008 Author Share Posted April 18, 2008 Yeah I thought SLU was getting partial shares for just coming into the conference, but then notice Charlotte. I have no idea. I thought maybe you guys might know. It's clearly not based on record. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidnark Posted April 18, 2008 Share Posted April 18, 2008 Why is SLU only getting 67k? we were curious about that over at Xavierhoops. Just a guess on my part, but payouts are based upon a six-year payout. SLU was not a member of the A-10 during four of the last six years and didn't have a single NCAA appearance during that period. I presume that Charlotte received some credit for their pre-A-10 apperances, while SLU only receives a "non-generating" share of the A-10 payout for last season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xfactor9600 Posted April 18, 2008 Author Share Posted April 18, 2008 Just a guess on my part, but payouts are based upon a six-year payout. SLU was not a member of the A-10 during four of the last six years and didn't have a single NCAA appearance during that period. I presume that Charlotte received some credit for their pre-A-10 apperances, while SLU only receives a "non-generating" share of the A-10 payout for last season. That could be it. I read an article about this recently, but can't remember enough to apply the formula though. I think you're onto something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kshoe Posted April 18, 2008 Share Posted April 18, 2008 Just a guess on my part, but payouts are based upon a six-year payout. SLU was not a member of the A-10 during four of the last six years and didn't have a single NCAA appearance during that period. I presume that Charlotte received some credit for their pre-A-10 apperances, while SLU only receives a "non-generating" share of the A-10 payout for last season. I think that is a logical guess as to what could be happening. What is surprising is that CUSA would have "let" Charlotte take any of the NCAA credits they earned in the 4 years prior to the A-10, and why Charlotte would even put them into the A-10 pot for distribution. I'm also a little surprised at how little sharing is going on in the conference considering that Xavier and St. Joes are getting about 3X the revenue that the Fordhams of the world are getting. I know the Big 12 is much more communistic in nature as the revenues get split close to evenly, regardless of who earns them. I'll be an optimist and say this will be a good thing a few years down the line when we are dancing every year we get to keep more of the revenue to ourselves... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOSLU68 Posted April 19, 2008 Share Posted April 19, 2008 I think that is a logical guess as to what could be happening. What is surprising is that CUSA would have "let" Charlotte take any of the NCAA credits they earned in the 4 years prior to the A-10, and why Charlotte would even put them into the A-10 pot for distribution. I'm also a little surprised at how little sharing is going on in the conference considering that Xavier and St. Joes are getting about 3X the revenue that the Fordhams of the world are getting. I know the Big 12 is much more communistic in nature as the revenues get split close to evenly, regardless of who earns them. I'll be an optimist and say this will be a good thing a few years down the line when we are dancing every year we get to keep more of the revenue to ourselves... Considering performance I would think UMASS would be more upset with this formula than we would be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MusicCityBilliken Posted April 19, 2008 Share Posted April 19, 2008 I think that is a logical guess as to what could be happening. What is surprising is that CUSA would have "let" Charlotte take any of the NCAA credits they earned in the 4 years prior to the A-10, and why Charlotte would even put them into the A-10 pot for distribution. Remember leaving CUSA was different then when we left the MCC. Since both Charlotte and us had no football, they kind of wanted us out rather then both of us opting to get out. Therefore maybe Charlotte made a big enough stink when leaving (with recent NCAA appearances), that they, through the A10, was able to get some of the income generated by those appearances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.