Cowboy Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 -seeing that the Blues are going to wear helmets with the names of sponsors and understanding that we have the Nike swoosh, what are thoughts on seeing other sponsors on our uniforms? -Blues are saying this is only for this season, we'll see about that -while I don't want our kids to look like NASCAR racers, two years ago I would have said no way, today I can see it and would not be bothered by it if somewhat tasteful -not sure what the Nike deal would allow, if anything, but if The U can generate some funds with this I understand if they did it -heck, imo The Billiken is too small on at least one of the current jerseys the guys wear Quote Link to post Share on other sites
majerus mojo Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 gross but inevitable Billiken Rich 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
brianstl Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 What I am really interested in is the laws that Congress is going to pass when it comes to a players name, image and likeness. At a place like SLU where the program is the top level of basketball being played in a top 25 media market, these laws could end up being very good for the program's future. BilliesBy40 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AnkielBreakers Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 I am only fine with this if the coaches have to wear or wave poster boards. Or we could have them dress up as mascots. “Bring it on down to OmeletteVille” Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.