RiseAndGrind Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 Again, at home. This time to a 5-4 Nevada team. Nevada has losses to Pacific, UC-Irvine, Drake, and Marshall. Thanks UDub! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slu72 Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 No, thanks JC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 Although slipping some UW is still a B team. Now that they are starting to get some of their players healthy they could still have a good season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JettFlight5 Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 Although slipping some UW is still a B team. Now that they are starting to get some of their players healthy they could still have a good season. I don't quite agree with your rankings if Washington is even an average team. That was an awful loss to a bad team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JettFlight5 Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 To follow, I usually agree with most everything Wiz has posted. That was UMSL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billboy1 Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 I guess Nevada had more than 3 free throws for the game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted December 9, 2012 Share Posted December 9, 2012 I don't quite agree with your rankings if Washington is even an average team. That was an awful loss to a bad team. Nevada is not a bad team...A C team that played above average including 2 spectacular long 3s at the end of the game to win it. Now that UW has Kemp and Suggs back they will play more like a B team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doowop Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 I guess Nevada had more than 3 free throws for the gameNevada scored 76 points and allowed Washington 73. If we had scored 76 points we would have won easily. We need more offense. If we could average over 70 points a game we would lose VERY FEW games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2010andBeyond Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Nevada scored 76 points and allowed Washington 73. If we had scored 76 points we would have won easily. We need more offense. If we could average over 70 points a game we would lose VERY FEW games. If we score more than the other team, we would rarely lose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizziken Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 I could give 2 shits about Washington at this point...Kansas blew out a previously ranked Colorado team by 36 points. This all means nothing at this point... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wiz Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 I could give 2 shits about Washington at this point...Kansas blew out a previously ranked Colorado team by 36 points. This all means nothing at this point... Depends if you want it to be a "quality loss" or not. If UW 's numbers get better than so do ours. You want all our opponents to do well except when they play us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizziken Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Depends if you want it to be a "quality loss" or not. If UW 's numbers get better than so do ours. You want all our opponents to do well except when they play us. Completely agree, Wiz...I understand the importance and impact on us if washington does well. But in terms of our on-the-court progress, I'm not a fan of these comparative analyses Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doowop Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 If we score more than the other team, we would rarely lose.If we score more than the other team we would NEVER lose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiseAndGrind Posted December 11, 2012 Author Share Posted December 11, 2012 Completely agree, Wiz...I understand the importance and impact on us if washington does well. But in terms of our on-the-court progress, I'm not a fan of these comparative analyses Sorry, I was speaking more towards people thinking that Washington was an "ok" loss. I was just pointing out that it would be nice if UDub started winning some GD games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JettFlight5 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Nevada is not a bad team...A C team that played above average including 2 spectacular long 3s at the end of the game to win it. Now that UW has Kemp and Suggs back they will play more like a B team. I meant it more in relation to SLU. We'll regret losing that game. Not saying anything about Nevada. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.