Bearvision Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 all that i know is that taking out the national program games like north carolina or gonzaga that bring in the st louis area casual fan the programs that bring the most fans to a slu game consistently are xaiver and dayton. somebody thinks it is a rivalry. I'm aware that you feel they are your rivals, what I'm saying is, is that I don't see that coming from their end for the most part. Maybe I'm wrong on that, I don't know the games as well as you would. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billiken_roy Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 You came off a little arrogant and elitist in your putting words into others' posts Roy...from what I've seen on here, you're well-respected, so I'll just assume this is an issue that bugs you, and chalk it up to that. you are right it bugs me. imo there is no doubt that dayton and xaiver are perfect partners/rivals and just being in the same conference with them justifies all. yet for some reason mvc fans and casual fans think we would be much better off playing evansville and wichita state and northern iowa and drake, etc. other than creighton, the mvc schools have nothing in common with us. yet we have to rehash it every 6 months it seems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saluki762 Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 SIU outdrew XU last year in STL and the game took place during a blizzard. SIU is easily SLU's biggest non-conference rival and a better draw that XU or Dayton most of the time. If it wasn't for a blizzard last year, it would have been better attended than Dayton. This is not an argument for the MVC just pointing out that people do seem to care more about SIU than Dayton or XU. Give SLU a couple more years in the A-10 and that should change but you know Biondi will jump conferences the first chance he gets if he thinks he can make a profit. You can forget about Missouri State though, no one cares about them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearvision Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 you are right it bugs me. imo there is no doubt that dayton and xaiver are perfect partners/rivals and just being in the same conference with them justifies all. yet for some reason mvc fans and casual fans think we would be much better off playing evansville and wichita state and northern iowa and drake, etc. other than creighton, the mvc schools have nothing in common with us. yet we have to rehash it every 6 months it seems. Understood. You would probably fit well in the Valley, and I'd take it more as a sign of the recognition from Valley schools that you have the opportunity to have a great program, more than I'd take it as constantly trying to belittle them. Not saying you are doing that, but I see it a lot from A-10 fans. There is an ebb and flow in the college basketball world, and the Valley has been up some, and the A-10 has been down some outside of X. Now, the A-10 is back up some, and the Valley is more down. When the Valley is up, it doesn't prove SLU should be there, and when the A-10 is up, the same can be true. You are a Jesuit, solid academic, private school in a large metro area. That aligns you more with some of the A-10 (14?) schools, but the goal of every institution is that of higher learning. My shorts only bunch when some of the SLU brethren try to pass themselves off as a little more than they are. None of us are Yale in academics, nor Gonzga in basketball. This does not mean we shouldn't strive for excellence though, and I believe all of these schools are pushing toward that goal... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearvision Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 You can forget about Missouri State though, no one cares about them. ESPN ranked all basketball programs in Division I for prestige. SIU checked in at #52, and Missouri St. checked in at #57 in all of division I basketball. First and second in the Valley, I'd say someone cares about Missouri St. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billiken_roy Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 You would probably fit well in the Valley, other than geography and creighton we have nothing in common with the valley. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saluki762 Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 ESPN ranked all basketball programs in Division I for prestige. SIU checked in at #52, and Missouri St. checked in at #57 in all of division I basketball. First and second in the Valley, I'd say someone cares about Missouri St. the LOL emoticon should have shown I was joking. not really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearvision Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 other than geography and creighton we have nothing in common with the valley. You are not better than the Valley. You are not better than the schools in the Valley. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearvision Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 the LOL emoticon should have shown I was joking. not really. You were not joking... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upsaluki Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 From my point of view the biggest thing that creates a rivalry for out of conference foes is playing a lot of games against each other where neither team has the upper hand. Geographic proximity would be the second biggest thing. I thought we were going to get a good rivalry going with Bultler, but they weren't on the schedule this year. Those were tight games against some pretty evenly matched teams, and a lot of fans on both sides would have liked to see them continue. I would like to see the rivalry with SLU continue. In conference, the biggest thing that builds a rivalry is competing for the top spot, followed by geographic proximity. That's why Creighton is our biggest rival in the MVC, followed by in-state schools like Bradly and Illinois State. Attendance numbers from ESPN boxscores: 2007-2008 SIU Attendance: 10,918 Dayton Attendance: 11,108 Xavier Attendance: 10,823 2006-2007 MSU Attendance: 10,448 Xavier Attendance: 10,861 Dayton Attendance: 8,847 2005-2006 SIU Attendance: 8,875 Xavier Attendance: 9,749 Dayton Attendance: 10,264 Conference standings 2007-2008 Standings Conference Overall W L GB PCT W L PCT Xavier 14 2 - .875 27 6 .818 Temple 11 5 3 .688 21 12 .636 Massachusetts 10 6 4 .625 21 10 .677 Saint Joseph's 9 7 5 .563 21 12 .636 Charlotte 9 7 5 .563 20 13 .606 Richmond 9 7 5 .563 16 14 .533 Dayton 8 8 6 .500 21 10 .677 La Salle 8 8 6 .500 15 17 .469 Rhode Island 7 9 7 .438 21 11 .656 Duquesne 7 9 7 .438 17 13 .567 Saint Louis 7 9 7 .438 16 15 .516 Conference standings 2006-2007 Standings Conference Overall W L GB PCT W L PCT Xavier 13 3 - .813 24 8 .750 Massachusetts 13 3 - .813 23 8 .742 George Washington 11 5 2 .688 23 8 .742 Fordham 10 6 3 .625 18 12 .600 Rhode Island 10 6 3 .625 19 14 .576 Saint Joseph's 9 7 4 .563 18 14 .563 Dayton 8 8 5 .500 19 12 .613 Saint Louis 8 8 5 .500 20 13 .606 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billiken_roy Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 You are not better than the Valley. You are not better than the schools in the Valley. how does "nothing in common" = "better than the valley"? unless you are talking about reading comprehension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearvision Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 I'd agree with UpSaluki, but it really matters little at this point. Spirited games between teams that have either played versus one another for a long period, close games on a continuin basis, or geographic proximity. SLU is happy in the A-10, why would the Valley even want them at this point? It's like trying to keep a girl that doesn't want to be with you...all parties end up unhappy in the end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saluki762 Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 how does "nothing in common" = "better than the valley"? unless you are talking about reading comprehension. He went to Missouri State, are you surprised. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearvision Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 how does "nothing in common" = "better than the valley"? unless you are talking about reading comprehension. Even you must admit, most times, geography is the number one determinant in conference affiliation. Why am I even in this debate? SLU in the Valley, or not, does not matter to me. It's not like we'd be gaining a national program that would strengthen the Valley, and if you did join, we'd be gaining a program that has prior affiliation and a "name" coach with a nice, new arena. Matters little either way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearvision Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 He went to Missouri State, are you surprised. A Saluki talking about the quality of education from another school...too funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saluki762 Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 A Saluki talking about the quality of education from another school...too funny. It would be but I went to SLU. I am really just joking though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearvision Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 It would be but I went to SLU. I am really just joking though. I really need to lighten up on the caffeine...allowing a discussion on a message board to bug me is bad enough. Reading into the tone of written words without any non-verbal cues to use, is worse. Good luck to both schools in the future. I believe it is much more fun when all the programs are good, and is good for the basketball in the area... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianstl Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 the LOL emoticon should have shown I was joking. not really. Really who does care about MSU. It is not even the quality party school it was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Iken Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 you are right it bugs me. imo there is no doubt that dayton and xaiver are perfect partners/rivals and just being in the same conference with them justifies all. yet for some reason mvc fans and casual fans think we would be much better off playing evansville and wichita state and northern iowa and drake, etc. other than creighton, the mvc schools have nothing in common with us. yet we have to rehash it every 6 months it seems. XU and Cincinnati are huge rivals and SLU (or any other school) will never form a natural rivalry with XU to match it. Those schools hate each other. They may not have much in common in terms of institutional qualities, but they are in the same city and that it enough. Geography matters, at least within city limits. The Dayton rivalry with Cincinnati has also been a good one, but I think they too view Xavier as an important rival. Maybe even Miami (Oh) to some extent. Others will know more than I would on Dayton. Unless SLU, Dayton and Xavier compete hard for the title over the next few years, I don't see a real rivalry forming. At the moment, I'm happy with allowing the rivalry with SIU© to form naturally through competitive games every year, regardless of whether the schools have much in common. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianstl Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 XU and Cincinnati are huge rivals and SLU (or any other school) will never form a natural rivalry with XU to match it. Those schools hate each other. They may not have much in common in terms of institutional qualities, but they are in the same city and that it enough. Geography matters, at least within city limits. The Dayton rivalry with Cincinnati has also been a good one, but I think they too view Xavier as an important rival. Maybe even Miami (Oh) to some extent. Others will know more than I would on Dayton. Unless SLU, Dayton and Xavier compete hard for the title over the next few years, I don't see a real rivalry forming. At the moment, I'm happy with allowing the rivalry with SIU© to form naturally through competitive games every year, regardless of whether the schools have much in common. I think the closeness of the schools contributes greatly to those rivalries. That is why I think it would be smart for SLU to start scheduling SIUE. I don't remember it myself, but I have heard stories about the old SLU-SIUE soccer rivalry and it was supposed to be a holy war between the two schools. SIUE is years away from being a good team, but a series need to start somewhere. Playing SLU might be able to help jump start that program. It is my belief that more good college programs in the area will have a trickle down effect on HS and AAU ball in the area. It would give another reason for local kids to stay home. It means more D1 kids playing in the summer league. I think it would help raise the quality level of basketball throughout the area. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
William Iken Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 I think the closeness of the schools contributes greatly to those rivalries. That is why I think it would be smart for SLU to start scheduling SIUE. I don't remember it myself, but I have heard stories about the old SLU-SIUE soccer rivalry and it was supposed to be a holy war between the two schools. SIUE is years away from being a good team, but a series need to start somewhere. Playing SLU might be able to help jump start that program. It is my belief that more good college programs in the area will have a trickle down effect on HS and AAU ball in the area. It would give another reason for local kids to stay home. It means more D1 kids playing in the summer league. I think it would help raise the quality level of basketball throughout the area. Of course, geography matters more than anything else (in most cases). That was really the point. The 'bronze boot' was a fantastic game and I'm hoping it - no, make that it better - reappears now that SIUE is back to D I in soccer. I agree, establishing the rivalry in basketball would be good for the area, but SIUE may want to wait a few years to build their program before doing so. If the games are laugh-ers, it won't make a good rivalry (unless of course the games turn ugly and teams start to really hate each other). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clock_Tower Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 I think the closeness of the schools contributes greatly to those rivalries. That is why I think it would be smart for SLU to start scheduling SIUE. I don't remember it myself, but I have heard stories about the old SLU-SIUE soccer rivalry and it was supposed to be a holy war between the two schools. SIUE is years away from being a good team, but a series need to start somewhere. Playing SLU might be able to help jump start that program. It is my belief that more good college programs in the area will have a trickle down effect on HS and AAU ball in the area. It would give another reason for local kids to stay home. It means more D1 kids playing in the summer league. I think it would help raise the quality level of basketball throughout the area. Brian. You cannot be serious. If all that matters is closeness, then why isn't our annual game against Harris Stowe a "holy war"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soderball Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 I'd rather play SIUE than USC-Upstate. Or Samford. Or Savannah State (though they are suprisingly good this year, for being Savannah State, i guess.), or UMSL as our first game, for that matter. At least SIUE is D1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianstl Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 Brian. You cannot be serious. If all that matters is closeness, then why isn't our annual game against Harris Stowe a "holy war"?That is why I said it has to start to tart somewhere. I don't expect to be a "holy war" right away. Long term thinking. I much rather watch a SIUE team with local players on it than some of the teams we bring in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjray Posted December 16, 2008 Share Posted December 16, 2008 other than geography and creighton we have nothing in common with the valley.Isn't that overstating it Roy? SLU used to play in the Valley. The Missouri Valley headquarters are in St. Louis. The conference tourney is held annually in St. Louis. And geographically, we're bracketed by Valley schools. Of course I prefer playing b-ball in the A-10 but we don't need to put down the Valley to make that point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.