BIG BILL FAN
Members-
Posts
1,657 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
15
Everything posted by BIG BILL FAN
-
Coach’s Radio Show Monday 7 pm
BIG BILL FAN replied to HoosierPal's topic in Billikens.com Main Board
Thanks for posting. -
Perfect description, Hines had far too much confidence in his game.
-
GDT? Did everyone go to olean?
BIG BILL FAN replied to Band Legend's topic in Billikens.com Main Board
It was a 3 point game when Hines proceeded to lose the ball twice and forced a bad shot, which led to 8 straight Bonnie points. -
GDT? Did everyone go to olean?
BIG BILL FAN replied to Band Legend's topic in Billikens.com Main Board
And apparently Hines thinks he is Steph Curry as well. He just kills any momentum you get. -
GDT - Billikens Ram Fordham
BIG BILL FAN replied to billikenbill's topic in Billikens.com Main Board
There was definitely video, not good. -
GDT - Billikens Ram Fordham
BIG BILL FAN replied to billikenbill's topic in Billikens.com Main Board
Have to agree -
Gordon suspended after altercation.
BIG BILL FAN replied to TigerMatt's topic in Billikens.com Main Board
What the hell is wrong with you? Just stop the bs. -
GDT: SLU v. A Different Type of Havoc
BIG BILL FAN replied to SluSignGuy's topic in Billikens.com Main Board
French only has 1 foul. -
Thanks
-
Not saying I know anything, but does anyone find it odd that Raboin hasn’t appeared in even one game?
-
My small theory on the situation
BIG BILL FAN replied to TFord and TRavs's topic in Billikens.com Main Board
Any of her beliefs and actions could be considered in making a determination of whether her decision is tainted. This is something another arbiter or possible juror could consider. I think the most damning evidence is the severity of the punishment. From my admitted limited knowledge, this punishment seems far over the top, considering what others have received for a similar offense. Again, even if the facts are accepted by everyone, isn’t the punishment reviewable by a second party? -
My small theory on the situation
BIG BILL FAN replied to TFord and TRavs's topic in Billikens.com Main Board
The question is whether she is allowing her bias to influence her decision. Compared to other situations at other universities, her punishment seems extreme. -
Not if they had the authority to do so. You don’t have to question the findings to still question the punishment.
-
Katherine Weathers- hearing officer?
BIG BILL FAN replied to gobillsgo's topic in Billikens.com Main Board
Then stop attacking people and you won’t be called a prick....pretty simple -
Katherine Weathers- hearing officer?
BIG BILL FAN replied to gobillsgo's topic in Billikens.com Main Board
Stop acting like a prick! -
Here is a key point, even if SLU followed all of the Title 1X guidelines (which is debatable) they still have the authority to determine the punishment. Universities have had a wide range of disciplinarian actions for the same action. The severity of the punishment, compared to what others are receiving for the same findings is appalling in this instance. The higher ups at SLU do have the power to alter the punishment if not the findings. I hope enough pressure is applied to rectify this egregious decision. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bustle.com/p/how-do-schools-punish-students-who-violated-title-ix-each-university-has-its-own-system-81503/amp