Jump to content

Slu let the dogs out?

Billikens.com Donor
  • Posts

    2,082
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Everything posted by Slu let the dogs out?

  1. I'm sure this has been discussed ad nasuam and this is an incredibly dumb question but if these three are gone, we have three more schollies to fill for next fall? Or would we not be able to fill those spots right away/lose scholarships?
  2. Question about signed recruits: Gordon and Thatch can decommit but they would both have to sit out a year, correct?
  3. West Coast Billiken seems to be confusing an anonymous internet chat forum with investigative journalists at WaPo. My opinions, just like everyone else's, are based on the few facts we have and a lot of second hand information. No one is claiming their opinions are based on anything but. This is where people come to speculate. 99% of us on this board have not or will not extend our opinions beyond this board simply because we DON'T know all of the facts. That doesn't mean we still can't form opinions on the matter even if there is little to go on. I know the players haven't been charged with a crime. I know how SLU handled S1. I know what can happen when parents get involved. Short of just two made up twitter profiles (John Brown and T Murks) accusing Pestello and SLU of being racists and sexists, most of the public outcry has been people fed up with the lack of transparency and timing of this whole situation. There's nothing wrong with the latter.
  4. Just checked the Instagram account. Geez, was the entire squad born in January? That's a lot of birthdays!
  5. you've spent the past 20 minutes crying about people making assumptions and then followed it up with a post making assumptions. Once again, if you're not interested in speculation, assumptions, and people's opinions, why are you even reading and commenting in this thread?
  6. IF???? IF????!!!! The more likely scenario?!?!?!??! Why don't you wait for the facts???
  7. lmao lol rotfl omg no shi*t it's based on assumptions! If we had all the facts this thread would only be 10 pages. Are you patting yourself on the back because you think you forced some billkens.com confession or something? Yikes. Based on SLU's history, the influence of powerful, white dads in this city, the length of this entire sh*tshow, and the perception of big scary African American athletes in general....the ASSUMPTION that one of the girl's father is hell-bent on seeing that these players are kicked out of school isn't an unreasonable viewpoint. I love how WCB is getting worked up about everyone getting worked up. If you turn your nose to assumptions and gossip, why do you continue to post in this thread?
  8. Aside from a few details, all we have are assumptions. Unless you know more details and aren't telling us? I have no narrative but if I did, it wouldn't be one that finds these 3 men guilty of breaking SLU's sexual misconduct rules while these girls get to walk. Unless something has changed, no criminal charges have been filed.
  9. Would the video not also show these girls engaging in sexual misconduct? If that's what is at play here, why is this cheerleader allowed to keep cheerleading (or whatever the verbiage is) right in front of the SLU bench while the players aren't even allowed to be in the building? Oh yeah, white daddy and his money!
  10. Yeah no offense to Frank but I don't think Frank knows what he's talking about half the time. I'll wait for a more reliable source than Frank before I freak out.
  11. Jesus, so instead of assigning any blame to his daughter he's hell-bent on ruining the lives of 3 black men? Sounds about right... This could also partially be why they lawyered up with Rosenblum. Probably not though.
  12. Care to provide more detail for those of us not listening to race cars roaring around the track on Frank's hot takes show?
  13. Freaking T Murks, man. The guy gets results. I want to throw him a bachelor party in Vegas even though he's not getting married.
  14. Forgive me if the answer is in another tweet or post but it doesn't say WHEN the findings were reported, correct? If they were reported last week, we could be half way through the appeals process by now in theory.
  15. WTF is this one not on tv either? What year is this, 1997?
  16. Do you actually think I would waste one ounce of breath discussing one of his low-level employees who lives in his mom's basement and trolls a SLU chat forum (I wouldn't)?
  17. Think he was let go last week and agree with you that he is pretty much the only "media" member in STL that has been vocal about this situation.
  18. It went from -6 to -4.5 so just a 1.5 point dip. Still though, I can't believe SLU is still favored by 4.5. Brian pointed out that they were at -4.5 yesterday so I wonder what caused the 1.5 point bump to -6 this morning. Maybe I'm just looking at a different website for odds.
  19. SLU started off the day at -6 but as of 3:30 pm are now 4.5 point favorites.
  20. Did you see his tweet from earlier today? Asking United Airlines why they featured a racist in their magazine. OH MY!!!!!
×
×
  • Create New...