rchif0 Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 It's a close one. Unfortunately, I'd say Mizzou is number 1, due to only losing 1 player that didn't play very much and showing signs of life last year. 1. Mizzou 2. MSU 2. SLU 4. SEMO 5. UMKC Yes, I have it as a toss-up between MSU and SLU, as I would consider MSU with slightly better players, but SLU has a better coach now. UMKC is still the suck, and I don't see them faring very well in the newly-named Summit next year. The top three are all very close though, and I wouldn't be surprised to see them all in the NIT at the least, and possibly the NCAA for one of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidnark Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 I think it is impossible to rank SLU right now because no one--not even Majerus--knows how and what SLU personnel will be used going into next season. Sure, Liddell and Lisch will still line up in the backcourt, but beyond that everything is unknown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rchif0 Posted May 11, 2007 Author Share Posted May 11, 2007 >I think it is impossible to rank SLU right now because no >one--not even Majerus--knows how and what SLU personnel will >be used going into next season. Sure, Liddell and Lisch >will still line up in the backcourt, but beyond that >everything is unknown. In that case, I would still rank them above UMKC and SEMO, if not ahead of Mizzou or MSU. They're definitely not in the bottom half. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.