cheeseman Posted December 31, 2008 Share Posted December 31, 2008 Once again no picture in the paper of the Bills game. I know photographers where there because I saw them. I guess the just decided that two pictures of the IL game was better. At least MU got one. I could care less about the pictures but when you see the articles side by side and one has a picture and the other doesn't, it makes the one without look second class. At least they have been consistent lately by not having picture. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonwich Posted December 31, 2008 Share Posted December 31, 2008 Once again no picture in the paper of the Bills game. I know photographers where there because I saw them. I guess the just decided that two pictures of the IL game was better. At least MU got one. I could care less about the pictures but when you see the articles side by side and one has a picture and the other doesn't, it makes the one without look second class. At least they have been consistent lately by not having picture. So, the matching 20-inch story about the women's game (with a picture) doesn't count? Sorry, your criticism today carries no water. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dewey33 Posted December 31, 2008 Share Posted December 31, 2008 So, the matching 20-inch story about the women's game (with a picture) doesn't count? Sorry, your criticism today carries no water. There is also a photo gallery from the women's game on stltoday.com....8:00 pm start time for the men and a high profile opponent made the women a better option for them last night.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BillikenReport Posted December 31, 2008 Share Posted December 31, 2008 There is also a photo gallery from the women's game on stltoday.com....8:00 pm start time for the men and a high profile opponent made the women a better option for them last night.... This is probably a good time to point out that the Associated Press hasn't been shooting all of the SLU games this year either. I don't know if it is because the opponents lack the name power or not, but I believe they shot every game last season. They did shoot the women's game last night, but not the men's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
provos528 Posted December 31, 2008 Share Posted December 31, 2008 I don't know I like it that way, It is better to be underrated than being the talk of the town with all air... Patience... ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonwich Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 This is probably a good time to point out that the Associated Press hasn't been shooting all of the SLU games this year either. I don't know if it is because the opponents lack the name power or not, but I believe they shot every game last season. They did shoot the women's game last night, but not the men's. The P-D photo was by Christian, not the AP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BillikenReport Posted January 1, 2009 Share Posted January 1, 2009 The P-D photo was by Christian, not the AP. Yes, but the AP shot that game as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheeseman Posted January 1, 2009 Author Share Posted January 1, 2009 So, the matching 20-inch story about the women's game (with a picture) doesn't count? Sorry, your criticism today carries no water. No the story on the women's game stands on its own. If now we should use the criteria that a team's coverage is measured by the total of all of its other teams get then that will make for an interesting comparison. I am glad they did nice job on the women's game but as far as I am concerned they are mutually exclusive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.