Jump to content

cgeldmacher

Billikens.com Donor
  • Posts

    3,497
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Posts posted by cgeldmacher

  1. This looks very promising. One tweet said that he wouldn't have any restrictions on the schools he can contact. I assume that means for being granted his release.

    I may have missed it in the article, but how many years of eligibility does he have left?

  2. What's the population count around Tacoma, WA where Zaga resides, probably less than a mil? Winning solves so many problems. Thanks J Crews for making us losers... big losers.

    How about around Omaha where Creighton seems to do well. Or Wichita. If we sustain some success, getting local kids will be a huge benefit. There is a lot of talent coming out of St. Louis.

    I assume we will have to start from the ground up, though. Get kids from wherever and start being competitive. Once that happens, you can supplement your national or Midwest recruiting with St. Louis kids that wouldn't mind staying home if the team is going to be successful. Having both, national and local, is necessary to what we want. It's what Xavier, Gonzaga, Creighton, etc. do to maintain their success.

  3. I was driving on Olive a few days ago and noticed that a traffic light is going up at the Olive Street entrance to the Olive Parking Garage. I assume this is being done to make exiting the garage after a game easier.

    I took a picture of it, but I don't know how to put a picture on a post. I assume there's some trick to it. Does anyone know?

  4. If he can get Moore, that would be outstanding. However, I worry we are headed down the same road with Moore as we were with Coach Drew. The board sets its expectations way too high on a guy that we may never have a shot at. Then, when Ford does sign some kid, everyone's down on him, because he's not a four star. Until a coach, hopefully Coach Ford, gets us to a level of sustained success, we cannot expect this level of recruit.

  5. Verbal Commits has us as having offers out on three guys for 2017 other than ZM.

    They are Nick Robinson (6'6" out of Chicago), Aleem Ford (6'7" out of Georgia), and Lorenzo Edwards (6'7" out of Chicago). Does anyone know anything about these guys? Verbal Commits has us down as having made offers, but those offers might be stale at this point.

  6. Watching that video caused a couple thoughts to pop into my head:

    1. Clearly that was T. Boone money buying that situation. That was much nicer than most pro teams.

    2. We would have to give the team Lorenzini's to have enough room to replicate that situation.

    3. I hope the 4 star players that Ford was getting to come there were coming due to his outstanding recruiting skills and not simply because they saw that locker room and said "I'm home!"

  7. The vast majority of the people who were upset would have settled for a Russell Turner, TJ Otzelberger, Martin Ingelsby, Chris Caputo, etc.. People weren't pissed because they didn't land Drew, Stallings, or Jacobsen. That is a completely false narrative. They were upset because Ford got the job.

    I agree, but I believe he was commenting on the few that thought we were going to get Drew or Stallings or that we should go after Jacobsen. His assessment that we had unrealistic expectations was not accurate in that it did not reflect what many on the board were feeling. I only agreed with him with respect to those that thought we should get one of those guys.

  8. He referenced the board the morning after Stu's story about Ford coming to SLU broke as well. Said it cracked him up and was a fun read...but that we had unrealistic expectations.

    He was right. Those that thought we were getting Drew or Stallings or Jacobsen weren't being realistic.

    That being said, Bernie needs to stop reading message boards, or at the very least realize that message board represent only a small portion of a fan base. I like listening to Bernie, but he needs to stop using the "my opinions vs. the message boards opinions" crutch to drum up controversy for his opinions and his show. He's entertaining to listen to without that. I always thought of him as the anti sports shock jock type.

  9. I was a big Miles supporter at the beginning, and I see each transfer as a missed opportunity for these kids to show what they can do under a coach that is not Jim Crews. However, with that being said, Coach Ford's special talent is supposed to be recruiting. So, each opening is a new opportunity for him to do what he does best.

  10. Again, which is what we should have done. There was nothing on Jim Crews' resume which gave anyone - even those who supported the hiring of Crews - any indication that Jim Crews was the best guy for our job. The politics of SLU being perceived as "loyal", "nice" and speculative fear about SLU firing such a "great guy" who filled in for deceased friend (RM) and after receivng "National Coach of the Year" honors was all bs. Had we hired a proven head coach (Travis Ford, Bryce Drew or Kevin Stallings type guy) there would have been no problems -- especially with a good PR firm spinning stories about Crews' advancing age, his having previously been retired and out of coaching but for RM and Alex Jensen, his not really wanting to be a coach again (whether true or not) and about SLU's need for the program to have a young/high energy guy who is not old or in bad health... Recall that we had the money in that RM had long already been making over a $1 million per year (we even paid Crews $850,000 per year) so I am sure we could have hired someone really good -- not some no-name, up and coming guy. Crews may have looked good compared to the likes of then "up and coming" assistant coaches like Soderberg and Gregory but not compared to Ford, Drew or Stallings.

    One interview by Crews where he says "no, I wanted to coach that team next year and into the future, but they didn't give me the chance," and any PR you did is worthless. Then the new coach would have been measured by the success Crews had in that first year. Comparing the new coach to that year would have already, by now, resulted in the new coach being fired.

  11. Also, this is another indication that Drew never intended to come to SLU. He has a choice between two decent positions. One an ACC school and the other an SEC school. We were never in the mix. I think we were waiting to hear an official "No" from him while the NIT was going on. His people probably dragged it out to keep his name swirling in the media around openings so that they could chum the water for the job he wanted to take (a BCS school job). His people knew something would open up and it did. He probably could have been in the mix for Pitt as well.

  12. Isn't Vanderbilt the obvious choice there?

    ACC vs. SEC. I can see a coach saying that the ACC is the league to be in. Kids obviously want to play in the ACC. Seven ACC teams made the Sweet 16 this year. Only one SEC team made it. I wouldn't say that Vanderbilt is the obvious choice.

×
×
  • Create New...