Jump to content

Zink

Members
  • Posts

    1,188
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Zink

  1. you're gonna make me reaverage w/o Oregon St. aren't you......

    110.2

    Illinois - 66

    Stony Brook - 161

    Kent State - 49

    Tulsa - 73

    Dayton - 42

    Illinois State - 80

    Cincinnati - 62

    Weber State - 89

    Arizona State - 68

    Jacksonville - 147

    Seton Hall - 61

    Texas Tech - 65

    Memphis - 60

    St. John’s - 81

    Mississippi - 47

    Troy - 119

    Virginia Tech - 51

    Quinnipiac - 144

    UCONN - 64

    Northeastern - 79

    Wichita State - 54

    Nevada - 69

    Rhode Island - 28

    Northwestern - 124

    Mississippi State - 59

    Jackson State - 204

    UNC - 70

    William & Mary - 67

    South Florida - 77

    NC State - 89

    UAB - 47

    Coastal Carolina - 139

    AVG = 82.34

    The NIT is way lower. i got an average of 82.34. However, the RPI calculator I used has factored in games since selection (not sure if yours did) so SLU's RPI, for example, is at 72 right now.

  2. In the 1st half we were getting open looks, but generally missing the shots - except for CS who looked really good on offense tonight (too many fouls though on D). Their zone was quite effective, as that was the defense they utilized during their run to end the 1st half and I figured they would stick with it. However, in the 2nd half, they stopped switching between man and zone, but really upped the ball pressure and overplayed us on off-the-ball screens, denying open looks from the perimeter. The way to combat this is to backdoor-cut, but for some reason or another this does not seem to be an option in our offense. This led to us forcing shots from outside.

    As for the hand-checking, literally every other team we have played in conference does it and gets away with it. A few calls were made on the perimeter for holding/reaching during non-con, but nothing since the conference season began. Unfortunately, we haven't really taken advantage of this, although I have seen KC hand-check his man effectively to prevent easy penetration. Hopefully the coaches will pick up on this and realize how much of a disadvantage this is against wing players who like to attack the basket - the type of player we often have trouble with.

  3. Will Clyburn.

    Sure was. he put up 52 earlier this season for his marshalltown cc team. an athletic scoring wing who can create his own shot would be a great addition to this team and take tons of pressure off KM. unfortunately, it seems ISU wants him, a teammate is going there, he has a relationship with the coach etc. also, if he came to SLU, that would probably mean no Loe

  4. Anyone think that players look at message boards? I would think it would be hard not to, but then again I wouldn't want to read some of the stuff posted about players if it was about me.

    my roommate saw a player on billikens.com while working in a computer lab over in the bschool. i won't say which one, in order to keep him out of trouble.

  5. repost from oh willie! ... seems more fitting here

    If you showed me only our side of the box score, I would have thought we won the game w/o too much difficulty. However, Crawford is a stud and they had some circus shots that NEVER go in. Surprisingly, our D is what let us down today, letting them shoot a high percentage from the field and giving up too many offensive boards.

    Willie's FT shooting was obviously disappointing, but we had so many opportunities to take control of the game, you can't single the kid out. He played great other than those adventures at the FT line. Overall, a great effort by the billikids... Most impressive stat of the night: SLU 17 assists to 6 turnovers

  6. With the exception of Willie's really poor free throw shooting we played a really great game.

    +1 If you showed me only our side of the box score, I would have thought we won the game w/o too much difficulty. However, Crawford is a stud and they had some circus shots that NEVER go in. Surprisingly, our D is what let us down today, letting them shoot a high percentage from the field and giving up too many offensive boards.

    Willie's FT shooting was obviously disappointing, but we had so many opportunities to take control of the game, you can't single the kid out. He played great other than those adventures at the FT line. Overall, a great effort by the billikids... Most impressive stat of the night: SLU 17 assists to 6 turnovers

  7. That's the problem, it's a weeknight game. Would have sold out by now if the game was on Saturday night. Us students will make the arena rock though, don't you worry about that. You will have never seen anything so white.

    so many jokes

  8. My understanding is that you have to demonstrate to the NCAA that a player would reasonable qualify for the academic scholarships regardless of his athletic situation. The professor exchange is purely objective and therefore not open to challenge. Likewise, a kid with a 31 or 32 on his ACT would probably at least qualify for the entry level academic scholarship.

    so what does signing the nli actually entail? as far as i know, that just means he commits to play here. scholarships are handled separately (so says my friend who was on the cc team and went through all of this). so hypothetically, he could pull an eckerle and come here, intent on paying his own way (plus academic scholarships, tuition remission, etc.) from the get go without an athletic scholarship. is there some flaw in this line of reasoning that i remain oblivious to? if so, any explanation would be much appreciated...

  9. hey fellow student sectioners... i know its a few weeks away but we want to plan something awesome for the temple game...

    there is a white out... there is a blue out...

    for the temple game we are trying to organize a checkerboard pattern for the student section...

    i talked to the blue crew prez and we should have left over blue shirts and left over white shirts...

    so for that game bring both...

    it will look awesome...

    let me know your thoughts if this will actually work...

    AND SPREAD THE WORD

    if we plan enough in advance.... we could pull this off

    ANY BAND MEMBERS SEE IF YOU GUYS COULD GET IN ON THIS AS WELL!!!!!

    The band is already two-toned with the rugbies, but we will all have the blue out & white out shirts too, so that's a possibility. We'll bring it up with Mike.

  10. Highly doubt it. The NCAA is very strict about making sure schools don't bend the rules to get around scholarship restrictions and once he signed a LOI any chances of giving him an academic scholarship and walking on went out the door.

    If Loe or anyone else ends up being a Billiken it will almost certainly be because a current scholarship player leaves the program...for whatever reason.

    Alright, thanks for the info... I don't know much about NCAA rules, but this did seem a little too good to be true. Darn.

  11. Heard a rumor that Dwayne Evans will be going here as a walk-on with an academic scholarship. Has anyone heard something similar to this? It would make sense, as we always hear about how great of a student he is. Also, his sister went to WashU and that's a bit pricey especially with no athletic scholarships at that level. Maybe his parents are willing to pony up a little extra for him to go to SLU? Also, this makes the ongoing recruitment of Loe make quite a bit more sense, as no one would be losing a scholarship as a result of his presence here at SLU.

  12. Christian is showing improvement and I expect him to be a much better player from day 1 next season.

    Definitely. Once CS truly finds his stroke, I think he'll be a game changer after adding that in addition to his already stellar D and swagger.

    Also, I would expect CE to have more room for overall improvement (than CS), just because of the gaps in his game at the present. CS can get better at shooting and general decision making, but that's about it... Maybe a pull-up jumper and ability to penetrate too, but those are usually natural abilities. CE can develop a post game, get into better shape and also become a force off the bounce from the perimeter/high post. And that doesn't even include places where he can improve on the defensive side (both on the ball and off the ball D needs work). CE is already good, but could develop the tools to become a dominant college player. CS will be a solid contributor and sometimes-spark plug off the bench for the next three years - like BC, except at the guard position - but I don't see his game improving by leaps and bounds, which CE does have the opportunity to do.

  13. I understand post play is different than getting to the rim, but your post play also draws fouls. Except if you are Billikens recently.

    Not quite at the same rate... BC is undersized therefore easy to defend w/o fouling. CR can't go left and can be guarded w/o fouling. JS and WR can present match up issues b/c of their quickness down low, but aren't strong enough to get into position where the defender is forced to either foul or give up an easy basket. Frankly I wouldn't hesitate to foul them, as they are both shooting at about a 50% clip from the line. I just don't like insinuating the refs are at fault in something like this when there are so many reasons to believe otherwise.

×
×
  • Create New...