>"He won the first time around with Grawer's players."  
> 
>All two of them.  Same guys that went 4-25 the year before.   
>One of them did not start on that team.  Which is weird  
>since they only had  what, 6 players?  
> 
>"And then won with Larry."  
> 
>Your point?  Still had to coach them with the best player  
>being a freshman, which makes it more impressive.  Do you  
>think Lorenzo or Brad would have done that?  I don't.  
> 
>"His recruiting overall was extremely inconsistent and as  
>time went on at SLU he lost interest in doing things as a  
>coach like recruiting a talent evaluation that it takes to  
>win."  
> 
>Actually it got a lot better after he solidified his team as  
>a post season threat.  Larry Hughes, Baniak, Tatum, Love,  
>Jeffers (a top 25 juco according to sporting news) and Perry  
>(another top 100 player).  Romar's and Brad's best players  
>were Spoon's recruits.  
> 
>He coached here for 7 years, a fairly long time for a  
>college like St. Louis.  If Gillen could do that, I say go  
>for it.  
> 
>If you discount Gillen, are you discounting Knight at Texas  
>Tech, Altman at Creighton, Willard at Holy Cross, Bennett at  
>Wash St and Wisconsin, Coles at Miami (OH), etc.  
FINALLY!  Someone with an accurate view of SLU history.