>"He won the first time around with Grawer's players."
>
>All two of them. Same guys that went 4-25 the year before.
>One of them did not start on that team. Which is weird
>since they only had what, 6 players?
>
>"And then won with Larry."
>
>Your point? Still had to coach them with the best player
>being a freshman, which makes it more impressive. Do you
>think Lorenzo or Brad would have done that? I don't.
>
>"His recruiting overall was extremely inconsistent and as
>time went on at SLU he lost interest in doing things as a
>coach like recruiting a talent evaluation that it takes to
>win."
>
>Actually it got a lot better after he solidified his team as
>a post season threat. Larry Hughes, Baniak, Tatum, Love,
>Jeffers (a top 25 juco according to sporting news) and Perry
>(another top 100 player). Romar's and Brad's best players
>were Spoon's recruits.
>
>He coached here for 7 years, a fairly long time for a
>college like St. Louis. If Gillen could do that, I say go
>for it.
>
>If you discount Gillen, are you discounting Knight at Texas
>Tech, Altman at Creighton, Willard at Holy Cross, Bennett at
>Wash St and Wisconsin, Coles at Miami (OH), etc.
FINALLY! Someone with an accurate view of SLU history.