Jump to content

An oldie but a goodie, getting new life


bauman

Recommended Posts

Big article on The Athletic about the Big East expanding with quotes from the BE Commissioner which make it seem like is will be happening.  In the Comments section after the article, SLU and UD are the schools most often mentioned!  A timetable based on the FOX TV contract is also mentioned and the Commish seems to downplay the addition of Gonzaga based on travel expense.

It is behind a paywall so you need to be a subscriber.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Athletic article is by their well respected CBB writer, Dana O'Neil.  It paints a different picture than the twitter input from Norlander.

I'm not quoting anything but the Headline indicates that they are not going to stay at their present number and in the articles itself it is mentioned that any expansion would likely be pre Feb 2024.

The most important factor is basketball investment and in a backward manner the Commissioner says geography is important due to travel costs associated with around 15 sports.  Further the Commish indicates that this discussion isn't going away in the near future.

This article certainly paints a different picture of BE expansion than the Norlander tweets, at least as I read it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, bauman said:

Athletic article is by their well respected CBB writer, Dana O'Neil.  It paints a different picture than the twitter input from Norlander.

I'm not quoting anything but the Headline indicates that they are not going to stay at their present number and in the articles itself it is mentioned that any expansion would likely be pre Feb 2024.

The most important factor is basketball investment and in a backward manner the Commissioner says geography is important due to travel costs associated with around 15 sports.  Further the Commish indicates that this discussion isn't going away in the near future.

This article certainly paints a different picture of BE expansion than the Norlander tweets, at least as I read it.

If the factors are basketball investment and geography, that bodes very well for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cgeldmacher said:

If the factors are basketball investment and geography, that bodes very well for us.

I would think that SLU or Dayton would be a lock if the BE just adds one school,  UD has more basketball tradition and even support, but SLU adds much more from a media market addition standpoint.

If they add 2 or 3 schools, it would seem that we would both be locks-good facilities (especially for BB and soccer), geography, sports, (especially MBB), academics, and similar traditions to most BE schools (private and with a religious affiliation).  A poster on The Athletic points out how adding SLU and UD could actually save significant travel expense by dividing the Conference into 2 divisions with the west having Creighton, Depaul, Butler, Marquette, Xavier, SLU and Dayton.  Many of these division pairings could be handled with bus trips if div. rivals played each other twice a year and the other div members once per year.  (Basketball only)

In the nonrevenue sports, travel costs could be saved by only playing regular season games w/in your division then having an eight team (4 from each division) tournament to determine the conf champion (this is an example only but show the possibility of holding down expenses)  If they were really interested is travel costing less, they could have the 4 teams from each div play to determine a div winner then have those two teams play each other.  Obviously, there are many other ways to do this to be cost effective.

While soccer is not a driver in these decisions, it is certainly a sport, both mens and womens, which is more than just along for the ride.  You might say it's riding shotgun.  Again SLU and to a lesser degree UD have excellent teams, attendance and facilities for this sport.

Our new sports-supporting facilities can be what helps get the ball across the goal line, so it is a great time to be making that investment !  This is a real opportunity for the SLU leadership so don't blow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, bauman said:

I would think that SLU or Dayton would be a lock if the BE just adds one school,  UD has more basketball tradition and even support, but SLU adds much more from a media market addition standpoint.

If they add 2 or 3 schools, it would seem that we would both be locks-good facilities (especially for BB and soccer), geography, sports, (especially MBB), academics, and similar traditions to most BE schools (private and with a religious affiliation).  A poster on The Athletic points out how adding SLU and UD could actually save significant travel expense by dividing the Conference into 2 divisions with the west having Creighton, Depaul, Butler, Marquette, Xavier, SLU and Dayton.  Many of these division pairings could be handled with bus trips if div. rivals played each other twice a year and the other div members once per year.  (Basketball only)

In the nonrevenue sports, travel costs could be saved by only playing regular season games w/in your division then having an eight team (4 from each division) tournament to determine the conf champion (this is an example only but show the possibility of holding down expenses)  If they were really interested is travel costing less, they could have the 4 teams from each div play to determine a div winner then have those two teams play each other.  Obviously, there are many other ways to do this to be cost effective.

While soccer is not a driver in these decisions, it is certainly a sport, both mens and womens, which is more than just along for the ride.  You might say it's riding shotgun.  Again SLU and to a lesser degree UD have excellent teams, attendance and facilities for this sport.

Our new sports-supporting facilities can be what helps get the ball across the goal line, so it is a great time to be making that investment !  This is a real opportunity for the SLU leadership so don't blow it.

All good points, including on travel costs, but I think "locks" is a strong term. They might bring different factors to the table, but I'd think UMass, VCU and/or Richmond, and possibly Wichita State would also at least be in the conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It makes sense for them to expand by 3 teams to get to 14 and have 2 divisions; East and Midwest. Midwest would be X, Butler, Creighton, DePaul, Marq, UD and SLU). They could really cut down on travel costs, important in inflationary times, especially for the non rev sports. As for hoops you could have 12 division games and 6 games outside div, so you’ve got a full conf schedule, ie everyone plays everyone at least once. Plus you’ve got some great geography rivalries. I don’t see any great rivalry’s for the MW schools as things stand today, but add SLU and UD you’ve got them. 
Again, let the lobbying begin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Compton said:

All good points, including on travel costs, but I think "locks" is a strong term. They might bring different factors to the table, but I'd think UMass, VCU and/or Richmond, and possibly Wichita State would also at least be in the conversation.

I could see Richmond or possibly VCU as the 7th East div. team but both are kind of like Dayton, in that they are separate medium-sized media markets which have an overlap with existing schools-Dayton with Xavier and Richmond and VCU with Georgetown.  Richmond's advantage over VCU is it's similar size to BE schools, no football team and I think it is private, but I'm not sure of that.  UMASS also overlaps with 2 separate media markets---UCONN and Providence so it adds little to the equation.  The Boston media market is already divided with many schools to follow and it is likely that any UMASS games are already televised by other outlets.   Wichita is further out of the geography than SLU and UD and frankly has lost its fastball - a good MBB program, so it basically has nothing going for it anymore.

Yes "locks" is a strong term for SLU and Dayton if BE expansion adds 2 or 3 schools but I'll stick with it for all the reasons in my earlier post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I’m sure Mqtte fans would love to add KU and Zaga, I.can’t see it. Especially for KU. They have FB and while it may not be much are they going to go independent? No. They have to be in a conf to get FB money. I could see them going to the Pac12 instead of the Beast. KU’s a pipe dream. As for Zaga, Few’s gonna leave someday. And what if they can’t match the success in the Beast they have had in the WCC? They’re stuck playing a lot of their games 2-3000 miles from home in a different time zone. Not to mention the cost of schlepping their non rev sports across the country. Doesn’t make sense to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I found interesting was how they dismissed anyone from the A10

From the article:

No one in the Atlantic 10 makes the Big East notably better or deeper, nor do they inspire television executives to throw money around like confetti. Yes, that includes Dayton, VCU, Saint Louis, and what the heck, yes, even Davidson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, slu72 said:

Especially for KU. They have FB and while it may not be much are they going to go independent? No. They have to be in a conf to get FB money. I could see them going to the Pac12 instead of the Beast. KU’s a pipe dream. 

Last month Kansas announced a $350 million renovation project for their football stadium. Enough said. 

CBFan likes this
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lord Elrond said:

What I found interesting was how they dismissed anyone from the A10

From the article:

No one in the Atlantic 10 makes the Big East notably better or deeper, nor do they inspire television executives to throw money around like confetti. Yes, that includes Dayton, VCU, Saint Louis, and what the heck, yes, even Davidson.

If you give the new A10 coaches 3 years to build their programs, I think the A10 will be very close to the Big East in terms of performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...