keyser soze Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 Just now, Bills71 said: Any Chance the forth is welmer? He hasn't played. Elliot was at the Locker Room Event, so the answer is no....He's just hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mechee89 Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 I feel bad for the people who are opening this up for the first time today. When I see that a thread has 20 new pages, I usually get excited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slu let the dogs out? Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 8 minutes ago, brianstl said: I think it was brought up here earlier that Goodwin is actually part of the Rosenblum 3. If Goodwin is apart of the Rosenblum 3 then the players hadn't been sitting out at the advice of their counsel. None of this makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianstl Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Bills71 said: Any Chance the forth is welmer? He hasn't played. I don't think Welmer would have been able to walk for six months if his injury prone body was involved in this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthSide_Billiken Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 1 hour ago, Old guy said: What about the girls? Great question. But as far as we know they have not been punished like the players for consensually participating in the exact same actions (based on the information we have). If school rules were broken and no assault occurred they all broke the same rules. We also know that two girls didn't participate in the investigation. How then can the investigation proceed. SLU is a joke. I'm embarrassed to be an alumnus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slufan13 Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 Actually hearing that there are women on campus who are pissed that the players were allowed to attend classes, practice, etc if this was going to be the end result Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianstl Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 1 minute ago, slufan13 said: Actually hearing that there are women on campus who are pissed that the players were allowed to attend classes, practice, etc if this was going to be the end result Well SLU's decision makes it appears as if they let sexual predators roam the campus for almost four months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gremio14 Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 1 minute ago, brianstl said: I thought I saw somewhere the fall of 2019. It looks like he is getting the Willie Reed treatment this time. No sexual contact with the women who is pursuing the case, but being punished for being there. Also correct. No sexual contact by JG. I have it fourth hand, but still traceable directly back to JG, he was suspended until 2020. As much as I hate it, the “transfer to Mizzou” talk is very real. My hope is JG goes the Kwamain route... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keyser soze Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 Time to kill all men's sports, forced castration for all the men, even the faculty, that means Freddy the Pimp - who walks with a LIMP... Kill all male oppressors...... This feels like the Movie PCU.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billikens747 Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 5 minutes ago, Gremio14 said: Also correct. No sexual contact by JG. I have it fourth hand, but still traceable directly back to JG, he was suspended until 2020. As much as I hate it, the “transfer to Mizzou” talk is very real. My hope is JG goes the Kwamain route... Makes absolutely no sense why he got the longest suspension then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmbilliken Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 It must have been Goodwin's decision to play. If Goodwin is suspended, he was a Rosenbloom client since the student who wasn't a Rosenbloom client was expelled. Therefore, two Rosebloom clients elected to sit and Goodwin decided to play. I am curious as to the reasons for the different punishments. I assume the expulsion was for posting the video on snapchat. Why did Goodwin only get 18 months and the other two 24 months? Finally, this thing was agreed to and planned ahead of time. That would take alcohol out of the equation since every consented previously by engaging in the planning. The only punishable thing would have been the camera. The 4 must have all conspired with the video plan without the women's input. There is no other way this could have come down to end up with this decision. Unless of course the decision just has no basis in fact and is inconsistent with the evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BACKHANDtheRICAN Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 Filling out a check to SLU for $0 as we speak. cgeldmacher likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aj_arete Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 This is very disappointing, but I think we're all ignoring the environment that we're living in today. Just because these four may not be charged with a crime, that doesn't mean they didn't violate the moral code of a private university. I'm unaware of what the student code is at SLU, but it is a religious institution. Their standard might be higher than a public institution and the players should have known what that standard was before signing up. What I'm surprised about is how very few are blaming the players for their irresponsible and reckless actions. Yes, I know that there are plenty students and student-athletes across the country that might have committed similar acts which went unpunished, but that doesn't excuse their behavior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keyser soze Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 1 minute ago, brianstl said: Well SLU's decision makes it appears as if they let sexual predators roam the campus for almost four months. that is the feminist title 9 definition of a sexual predator, not the legal real world definition..... hell every male baby born today is deemed a sexual predator in those "women's" eyes.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmbilliken Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 It must have been Goodwin's decision to play. If Goodwin is suspended, he was a Rosenbloom client since the student who wasn't a Rosenbloom client was expelled. Therefore, two Rosebloom clients elected to sit and Goodwin decided to play. I am curious as to the reasons for the different punishments. I assume the expulsion was for posting the video on snapchat. Why did Goodwin only get 18 months and the other two 24 months? Finally, this thing was agreed to and planned ahead of time. That would take alcohol out of the equation since every consented previously by engaging in the planning. The only punishable thing would have been the camera. The 4 must have all conspired with the video plan without the women's input. There is no other way this could have come down to end up with this decision. Unless of course the decision just has no basis in fact and is inconsistent with the evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teamarete Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 stu durando @studurando When informed of the SLU suspensions, signee Carte’are Gordon said “That is crazy.” Asked about his future with the program, he added “I’ll definitely have to take things into consideration.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majerus mojo Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billiken_roy Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, kmbilliken said: It must have been Goodwin's decision to play. If Goodwin is suspended, he was a Rosenbloom client since the student who wasn't a Rosenbloom client was expelled. Therefore, two Rosebloom clients elected to sit and Goodwin decided to play. I am curious as to the reasons for the different punishments. I assume the expulsion was for posting the video on snapchat. Why did Goodwin only get 18 months and the other two 24 months? Finally, this thing was agreed to and planned ahead of time. That would take alcohol out of the equation since every consented previously by engaging in the planning. The only punishable thing would have been the camera. The 4 must have all conspired with the video plan without the women's input. There is no other way this could have come down to end up with this decision. Unless of course the decision just has no basis in fact and is inconsistent with the evidence. apparently it is worth 6 additional months to be with a slu student. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRN Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 My question is who handles the appeal? Is it the same person who handed out the punishment. SLU is a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gobillsgo Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 In the STLToday article, the attorney for the fourth states that Rosenblum doesn’t know the sanctions for he fourth... seems to be denying the expulsion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLU_Lax Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 Rosenblum seems to be going after Kratky. How dare he question the Gold Standard of processes. It results in punishment for the men 100% of the time and that is something that SLU apparently can be very proud of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BACKHANDtheRICAN Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 SLU is a complete joke Westy03 likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills_06 Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, TRN said: My question is who handles the appeal? Is it the same person who handed out the punishment. SLU is a joke. It's a 3 person panel compared to one person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillIkenFan_Dan Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 We have to do something at next home game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
majerus mojo Posted January 19, 2018 Share Posted January 19, 2018 1 minute ago, BillIkenFan_Dan said: We have to do something at next home game mass walkout edit: sorry this would require people to attend the game, so maybe f—— that teamarete likes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts