Jump to content

Rammer and the Ref at VCU Game


SluBallz

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You're thinking of the game where Rammer ejected everyone else.

But seriously. This ref is a joke if he is worried what a broadcaster is saying. He apparently worked the New Mexico game and was the one who ejected Alford. That was a questionable ejection if I remember correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he really said that, he should never be allowed to ref a SLU game again, and certainly never one in the 'Fetz. Photo. Tape. League office.

This parallels the AP story about refs needing to be governed by a common body. This kind of crap should not be allowed.

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what Rammer said, "They're going to call a cheap foul on Evans and I'll tell you what.. I'm on the air right now, stay away from me... The official tried to get in our broadcast, we won't have it, we're not gonna have it... we're not gonna have it here, this is 101's broadcast."

Looks like it wasn't at the point where he said, "That's a horrible call!" as I thought. Occurred at the 1:53 mark of the second half where Troy Daniels made two FTs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every time you see me that Rammer's just so hype

I'm dope on the floor and I'm magic on the mic

Now why would I ever stop doing this

With refs makin' calls that just don't mix

I toured around the world from the Lou to the BAY

It's Rammer go Rammer

Rammer yo Rammer and the rest can go and play

35178519.jpg

<IMG SRC="http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/35178519.jpg">

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-thinking about putting all refs under common control, who is going to pay for it? I guess now it is either the school or the conf that pays the refs and there is about a base $1500 difference (500*3) between the BCS conferences and the A10 on a per game cost not including travel reimbursement/per diem, what is that difference between the BCS and the SWAC/MEAC/Big South etc?

-would the NCAA have done it already if they could?

-does this give the big guys another reason to exclude the little guys? or create their own sandbox?

-I doubt the big guys will want to subsidize the little guys except to continue to have buy games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...