OT: Avis Meyer vs. SLU...again
#3
Posted 07 July 2008 - 09:02 AM
#4
Posted 07 July 2008 - 09:22 AM
avis doesnt have a greedy or alterior motive bone in his body and i have no doubt biondi is all wrong on this one.
depriving those students the advice and help of avis meyer should be a crime.
- Walt Disney
#5
Posted 07 July 2008 - 09:27 AM
billiken_roy, on Jul 7 2008, 10:22 AM, said:
avis doesnt have a greedy or alterior motive bone in his body and i have no doubt biondi is all wrong on this one.
depriving those students the advice and help of avis meyer should be a crime.
Meyer shouldn't have tried to steal the name of the school newspaper. This situation, imo, is becoming an example of one person thinking he is more important than the univesity as a whole. This is a time I think Biondi is completely in the right.
#6
Posted 07 July 2008 - 09:32 AM
brianstl, on Jul 7 2008, 11:27 AM, said:
brian which came first? avis copywriting the name or biondi booting avis from his best and most effective educational advisor position? i think avis did what he did to try to stay involved in what he loves to do. helping journalism students create a newspaper. he was likely advised he needed some leaverage, and he wisely grabbed what he could. i would be shocked to hear from avis that he did it to extort money. if you find a quote from avis to that effect, let me know.
- Walt Disney
#7
Posted 07 July 2008 - 09:39 AM
brianstl, on Jul 7 2008, 10:27 AM, said:
he withdrew that over a year ago and then SLU filed suit even after he withdrew it.
#8
Posted 07 July 2008 - 09:40 AM
billiken_roy, on Jul 7 2008, 10:32 AM, said:
It was some pretty crappy advice. It is going to cost him a ton of money.
This shouldn't be about Avis and him staying involved in what he loves to do. This should be about what is best for SLU. The more I read about the story it seems to me that Avis is more worried about what is best for him. Nothing wrong with that, but it doesn't exactly make him a martyr for a cause.
#9
Posted 07 July 2008 - 09:43 AM
billikendave, on Jul 7 2008, 10:39 AM, said:
They can't allow someone to set a precedent for that kind of activity. SLU still has a vested intrest in seeing the suit through even with Meyer's withdrawl.
#10
Posted 07 July 2008 - 09:46 AM
- Walt Disney
#11
Posted 07 July 2008 - 09:49 AM
billiken_roy, on Jul 7 2008, 11:46 AM, said:
No I haven't. Which probably makes me much more objective about this case than you. I shouldn't need to remind you that I have blasted Biondi in the past on this board.
#12
Posted 07 July 2008 - 09:56 AM
brianstl, on Jul 7 2008, 11:49 AM, said:
that is a good point. i will step back on this one and plead conflict of interest. thanks.
- Walt Disney
#13
Posted 07 July 2008 - 09:58 AM
billiken_roy, on Jul 7 2008, 10:56 AM, said:
I will say this, Biondi would be extremely petty if he tried to collect any judgement SLU might recieve in their case against Meyer.
#14
Posted 07 July 2008 - 10:05 AM
We were called the "ULose" so many times when I was there, it does not matter. It is a learning ground for honing one's craft. I think it would behoove the administration to let a few pot shots go and take the heat --- it would only improve the administration's credibility in my book. But that's me. Everybody has pet names for all sorts of businesses so "ULose" doesn't matter. I remember Agony Airlines (Alleghany Air), Useless Air (U.S. Air), Krazo Airlines (Ozark spelled backwards) and today I work for a group whose acronym is CMA which we all call "Cover My Ass." I wouldn't trade my allegiance to the University News in for anything. Biondi is saying all the right things. I give him a neutral vote at this point and understand covering the Unversity's namesake in the legal end. My question would be does "The University News" have meaning explicitly to SLU? I mean, I've heard of things like "University Liquors," and "The University Apartments," and "University Cleaners." Not all associated with SLU but you get the meaning. Can Washington University sue over the name "University City?"
I always found Dr. Meyer to be a stand-up guy as far as convictions are concerned. If he believed that the school was doing this to censor the students, I can see him doing exactly what is described in this article. I don't know that I would have advised going through with it but I believe he had enough sense to know that the copyright issue was wide open and doable. Still, somebody on the ship declared mutiny. What's the captain going to do? Sounds like a great case of "he said, she said" and this can't be won in the court of public opinion.
All things are open to compromise. I can't see Biondi dropping the ball on this one. Too much precedent-setting. Compromise might be, we'll drop the legal fees if you stay out of the newsroom. I don't like it as far as the good Doctor is concerned because I like him as much as memory serves, but the other route means continuing the fight --- which means, at a minimum, added legal fees. And added bad press. Who needs that?
RockAvisHardPlace.
#15
Posted 07 July 2008 - 10:13 AM
brianstl, on Jul 7 2008, 10:49 AM, said:
Biondi's overbearing censorship came before Meyer's suit. He had to do something to try to keep free speech alive at SLU. The universities and student papers that do the best are the ones with complete freedom of the press.
The U News sucks with the staff tiptoeing around challenging issues. Biondi says publicly that he wants SLU to be the top Jesuit school in the country. To do that, the school is going to have to improve in a lot of areas, and censoring students and faculty is not a good start. Another recent example of this is his banning of The Vagina Monologues on campus in each of the past few years with weak reasons. These things don't happen at Georgetown.
Father Biondi: SLU student organizations
as
Vladimir Putin: Russian media
#16
Posted 07 July 2008 - 10:20 AM
Pistol, on Jul 7 2008, 11:13 AM, said:
The U News sucks with the staff tiptoeing around challenging issues. Biondi says publicly that he wants SLU to be the top Jesuit school in the country. To do that, the school is going to have to improve in a lot of areas, and censoring students and faculty is not a good start. Another recent example of this is his banning of The Vagina Monologues on campus in each of the past few years with weak reasons. These things don't happen at Georgetown.
Father Biondi: SLU student organizations
as
Vladimir Putin: Russian media
I must have missed all the dead bodies surrounding Biondi.
Biondi runs a private institution and that institution has the right to censor the school newspaper if it sees fit to do so. It might not be the smart thing to do, but it isn't Meyer's place or job to try steal the newspaper's name because he doesn't like what his bosses tell him.
#17
Posted 07 July 2008 - 10:41 AM
brianstl, on Jul 7 2008, 11:20 AM, said:
Biondi runs a private institution and that institution has the right to censor the school newspaper if it sees fit to do so. It might not be the smart thing to do, but it isn't Meyer's place or job to try steal the newspaper's name because he doesn't like what his bosses tell him.
Is that all this law suit is about? If so, then I still think this is stupid and Biondi is wasting our money and running off a top notch professor. I just googled university news. SLU is not the only place that has a publication called University News. Was University News trademarked prior to this lawsuit? This whole thing seems very stupid. As far as I know this does not include past articles, any research, or any profits made by the University News...just a name. I'm failing to see where the "Intellectual Property" is being jeopardized. Why doesn't Biondi sue the University of Dallas.
It's one thing to protect the University's assets and interests. It's another to be petty and vindictive. This seems to be the latter.
#18
Posted 07 July 2008 - 11:31 AM
brianstl, on Jul 7 2008, 10:43 AM, said:
That is what "cease and desist letters" are for. It happens everyday in patent, trademark, trade secret cases. SLU sent one and Meyer withdrew.
What is the purpose of a lawsuit? To remedy a wrong and not to set precedents.... at least so sayeth countless professors from SLU Law. In this case, the wrong has been remedied. The PR hit is tremendous.
FWIW, I have never heard on Avis Meyer before this whole process. I got curious and read the lawsuit and court docs. If this isn't retaliatory, i don't know what is.
#19
Posted 07 July 2008 - 11:34 AM
NashvilleBilliken, on Jul 7 2008, 11:41 AM, said:
It's one thing to protect the University's assets and interests. It's another to be petty and vindictive. This seems to be the latter.
no it was not trademarked, service marked or otherwise. SLU claims Meyer was creating the illusion that he was treading on SLU's good name and reputation for his own personal gain.
#20
Posted 07 July 2008 - 11:38 AM
brianstl, on Jul 7 2008, 11:20 AM, said:
Then you must not be looking very closely. He has truly transformed SLU. He doubled the size of the campus and it hardly is reminiscent of the commuter school from the 80s. Don't kid yourself into thinking that there aren't as many "dead bodies" as fountains on campus. Many think he sold SLU's Catholic soul when he chose Tenat over SSM for the hospital and for TIF money for the new arena.

Help
















