Jump to content

JC Hot Seat


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 535
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

John Reddon?

He was not a walk on per se. He did not have tryout he was given a place on the team automatically. Spoon brought him on with grants and other monies through the university. Apparently, schools did this at times when there are no schollies left and player really wants on the team and the coach really wants him. John R could have gone to school elsewhere on a schollie - he was a legit D1 - perhaps lower level - prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was not a walk on per se. He did not have tryout he was given a place on the team automatically. Spoon brought him on with grants and other monies through the university. Apparently, schools did this at times when there are no schollies left and player really wants on the team and the coach really wants him. John R could have gone to school elsewhere on a schollie - he was a legit D1 - perhaps lower level - prospect.

He was a preferred walk on. Recruited to come on the promise he would have a place on the team, but no scholarship. The player hopes to prove his worth and be awarded a scholarship down the road. I believe John was given a scholarship his senior year. He came on at the end of his senior season and made the all tournament team at the miracle in Memphis. I wonder if he was held back by his non-scholarship status?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was a preferred walk on. Recruited to come on the promise he would have a place on the team, but no scholarship. The player hopes to prove his worth and be awarded a scholarship down the road. I believe John was given a scholarship his senior year. He came on at the end of his senior season and made the all tournament team at the miracle in Memphis. I wonder if he was held back by his non-scholarship status?

That is pretty much what I said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The truth is obviously somewhere in the middle:

Crews should get credit for doing a pretty good job of guiding the team during the 2012-13 season. Yes, the players were all RM's but I give Crews an A. It was good enough to earn him national coach of the year so that seems like an A to me.

At least in my opinion, Crews did fine in 2013-14. I'd give him a B+. It's still the second best season we've had in the modern era in terms of NCAA seeding and final AP ranking, but maybe it could have been more.

Crews obviously deserves an F for last season. But you know who else get's an F for that season is Majerus as it was his failed senior (Glaze and Manning) and junior classes (McBroom, Drew, Carter) that turned the season into complete crap. There is only so much that freshmen can be expected to do and we've seen that many times through SLU history (Clags/Highmark class, Evans/Loe/Jett/McCall class). To ignore the failures of RM here is just ignorant.

What grade will he get this year is anyone's guess. Many seem to have already have given him an F though which is the odd thing to me. I for one am willing to let it play out...

I'd give Crews an A+ for his work the year Majerus died. Even if all he did was get out of the way and let the team coach itself. He did a good job leading the team through a hard time.

I think the team really underachieved in 13-14 but I'll also admit the talent on the bench was lacking and that's not really on Crews. Now, there were some blowout wins during that long win streak where I think everyone agreed Crews could have played the bench more. Just saving 2-3 minutes a game on Jett and Evans could have made a difference.

Last year Crews gets an F for sure. I also share your belief that Majerus deserves credit for the failure. But my problem last year was that the team regressed significantly as the season goes on and to me that is 100% on Crews. Also, I did not expect to come in and have 2-3 all-rookie players with one of them landing on the 2nd or 3rd all A-10 team, but after all our success, all of Crews' awards (deserved or not), and all our publicity (we got more than most top 25 teams), I really thought we would have landed a better recruiting class than that. Have I given up on them? Not at all (except maybe Jolly). but I did expect our freshmen to be better than that as freshmen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUESTION: Is SLU basketball coach Jim Crews on the hot seat this year?

STRAUSS: I wouldn't put him there. SLU knew it was going to deal with a rough transition following the 2013-14 team. Recruiting has been OK, but less than prolific. Let's see what last season's freshmen look like as sophomores. The A-10 may come back to them a little bit. The loss of a ball-handler and a rebounding presence were obvious last season. McBroom's transfer following diminished playing time hinted at other issues as well.

Either way, SLU needs to do better than 11 wins. (I expect they will.) The better question may ultimately be: How much longer does Crews want to coach?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUESTION: Is SLU basketball coach Jim Crews on the hot seat this year?

STRAUSS: I wouldn't put him there. SLU knew it was going to deal with a rough transition following the 2013-14 team. Recruiting has been OK, but less than prolific. Let's see what last season's freshmen look like as sophomores. The A-10 may come back to them a little bit. The loss of a ball-handler and a rebounding presence were obvious last season. McBroom's transfer following diminished playing time hinted at other issues as well.

Either way, SLU needs to do better than 11 wins. (I expect they will.) The better question may ultimately be: How much longer does Crews want to coach?

hopefully 1 more year :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Is that aimed at recruits?

The basketball program as well as the entire athletic department needs to do a much job marketing especially in utilizing social media. It seems pretty obvious that larger programs must utilize graphic designers in putting together some pretty slick looking graphics (that they send to recruits and put on social media), and we get crap like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really is a bizarre tweet. It appears to be for nothing - no date, no place, no context.

It's just an open invite, almost as if Crews will just be wandering campus like some late-60s guru trying to start a cult by sharing his enlightenment with others for free. Then, before you know it, he's got 12 undergraduate wives who left their sororities to follow him, recruit others, and start a commune on public lands about 2 hours from campus. Then things start to get ugly after several acid trips too many, too little food, and too few practical skills for living in the wilderness. So they turn to robbery and prostitution. Then a couple of the wives who remain somewhat lucid have the sense to defect in the middle of the night, hitchhike back to the city and alert the police. Then you've got a month-long standoff with a couple dozen dirty hippies, half of them claiming to be Guru Crews' wives, and a couple dozen state troopers and federal agents. It's just not going to end well.

All because of one misbegotten tweet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...