Jump to content

cpacmel

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

cpacmel's Achievements

Recruit

Recruit (1/7)

  1. >I will greatly anticipate seeing those 6 teams from the MO >Valley in the dance, and if so, good for them. I will happy if they get 3-4 bids in the Big Dance and another 3 bids in the N.I.T. BTW, did you know a top 6 conference in the RPI has always gotten atleast 3 teams in the Big Dance?
  2. > More Joe Lunardi press here. Ok, I will >play along again. Why is it okay to post thaat oh btw his >last 4 out are...when you don't add he has an MVC team as >part of his last four in...that isn't misleading and >misrepresenting facts? Picking and chooing which things >help your cause. It means it is also entirely possible he >may pick TWO only. Thanks for playing along. What this means is the MVC has 6 teams right now, right there for bids. You may not take anything out of Lunardi's "Next 4 out" but it means those teams are right there on the door step for at-large bids. >SIU for example, zero >high quality non-conference wins, they scheduled a ton of >mid level road winnable road games and won a lot of them. I guess you don't include Va Tech as a high quality non-conference win? That same Va Tech that has beaten UNC and DUKE both this season? It's cool man. I understand where your coming from. Your just alittle short on your facts. Good luck the rest of the season.
  3. >>And actually while we are at selective >facts...4 teams out of 10 is not half of the MVC. I wasn't >a math major but again you mislead with your presentation. > hey guy. Lunardi has 3 teams in already. In addition to those 3 that he has in, there are 2 additional teams in "the next 4 out" I will do the math for you, since you weren't a math major 3 IN + 2 "next 4 out" = 5 5 teams out of 10 is half our conference. Sorry bro.
  4. >cpac said, > >"I have nothing against the A-10. It is no where near as >strong as the MVC. I think any knowledgeable basketball fan >would say as much." > >and any knowledgeable fan would say the opposite just 3-4 >years ago when the decision was made. xu and st joes were >both in the elite 8 that year and the a-10 sent 4 teams to >the ncaa tourney that year. the mvc only sent 2 and >northern iowa only got in because they got hot and won the >mvc tourney. > >from 1999 thru 2004 the a-10 was a top 10 conference and the >mvc never got above 11th and usually lower. > >wouldnt we all love to have the convienence of being able to >know then what we know now. No doubt 3-4 years ago the A-10 was better than the MVC. No doubt about it.
  5. First of all, I could care less about the seeds. Just get into the tourney. Anything can happen then. Lunardi has 3 MVC teams in right now. He also has 2 of the last 4 out. I CAN LIVE WITH THAT. That's 1/2 our conference right there for bids. He has the Big Ten with 4 teams in. And 1 team as the last 4 out. To me that is very similar and I can live with that. And courtside, the VALLEY did pretty darn well last season, EVEN WITH THEIR POOR SEEDS. Even you can't deny that. Though I am sure you will try to.
  6. I think 'courtside' may have a small case of denial. It's nothing personal. I am a Mo Valley guy. My team is Illinois State. We (the Redbirds) stink. But I know quite a bit about all things college basketball. It maybe just a blip on the radar for a few years, but for the last 1.5 years the Mo Valley has been listed among the MAJORS in college basketball. Will it continue? Who knows. Coaches are in place as are facilites. I have nothing against the A-10. It is no where near as strong as the MVC. I think any knowledgeable basketball fan would say as much. And Lunardi's picks are usually right on. He doesn't give in because it's a BCS team vs. a mid-major. He goes with whom he thinks is most deserving. (according to how the committee would look at it.)
×
×
  • Create New...