cheeseman

I thought Rammer was supportive of Ford when all the stuff was happening?

It must be a real burden to be such a..

Maybe his injury history this year was caution for them

All three could play pg and did at times.

Nobody has said he has done anything wrong just that out of the 6 open schollies he has we still need a pg.

In Ford we trust moment

Don't get complacent - we need a pg without on we will be disappointed

We need wins - is this a guarantee - no but given our current roster condition and our need to show immediate improvement we should be happy that anybody is willing to invite us to anything. Lets not get ahead of our skis.

I am not sure what your point is - I said she can get more from endorsements.

Read the letter you get from the Club it specifically states only 80% is deductible - now if that has changed then I haven't seen it.

I understand I was only pointing out that her actual salary playing will be less then what she made on NIL. There will be others who won't get those endorsement deals

Her salary will be something like 65-70K a year. Now I agree she can make more from endorsements.

Good point - I would think this is why a school would not want to be doing the NIL paying. By doing so they no longer claim it is not us doing it.

Actually I think that may very well happen - many benefits you get over your salary is taxable so why not tax it.

The idea that the market always takes care of itself is not always true. When you let the power be concentrated in a few hands that is when excesses occurs. Last month the meat/poultry prices were credited with a driver of the increase in the inflation rate but with basically 4 companies controlling this market there is little incentive to bring prices down - in essence you have a type of a monopoly. A few blue bloods in basketball and football will end up controlling the NIL market thus setting the prices - a quasi monopoly.