kwyjibo Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 7 hours ago, gravilst said: How did SLU not get penalized during those early RM years? I thought if your APR fell bellow 230 for two years in a row the NCAA could reduce practice time and even cut the number of scholarships available. SLU was punished I believe but it was just the first level which means they lost practice time (which also meant mandatory study time). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetorch Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Ncaa has been inconsistent with its Apr penalties. They review it on a case by case basis and there have been schools punished harshly for low scores like Syracuse and u conn but others have been allowed to skate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kshoe Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 2 hours ago, kwyjibo said: SLU was punished I believe but it was just the first level which means they lost practice time (which also meant mandatory study time). I think the rules were different back in 2010 and 2011. They've gotten more punitive since then. I don't think we actually incurred any penalties, just were close to the line. 1 hour ago, thetorch said: Ncaa has been inconsistent with its Apr penalties. They review it on a case by case basis and there have been schools punished harshly for low scores like Syracuse and u conn but others have been allowed to skate. UConn really did get screwed, IMO. They had a poor APR but the poor scores occurred under an NCAA regime where the punishment was just lost scholarships. Then the rules were changed to involve post-season bans and because of the 4 year averaging they couldn't get out of the hole to get to the minimum required levels. To me it was the equivalent of speeding and being told after you got pulled over that the penalty was no longer a fine but the laws have changed while you were speeding and now you are going to jail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billiken_roy Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 14 minutes ago, kshoe said: I think the rules were different back in 2010 and 2011. They've gotten more punitive since then. I don't think we actually incurred any penalties, just were close to the line. I believe this is correct. had our roster creaming practice continued, we likely would have fallen to penalty level. but we stopped the practice about the time crews took over. its my understanding that if the transferring player is on pace to graduate with his freshmen class there are no penalties. the problem is that a lot of D1 basketball players lessen their academic load during the season and then use the summer to catch up academically. thus when they are asked to seek school options elsewhere they are behind academically. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bauman Posted March 20, 2017 Author Share Posted March 20, 2017 On 3/18/2017 at 9:18 AM, Bills_06 said: I'm sorry for being over 50! What does this tweet mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills_06 Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Just now, bauman said: I'm sorry for being over 50! What does this tweet mean? I took it to mean he'll be number 0 next year. Could be wrong though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prebilliken Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 7 minutes ago, Bills_06 said: I took it to mean he'll be number 0 next year. Could be wrong though. Goodwin wearing 0 would be soooooo dope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kwyjibo Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 2 hours ago, kshoe said: I think the rules were different back in 2010 and 2011. They've gotten more punitive since then. I don't think we actually incurred any penalties, just were close to the line. You are right. SLU did get the first level of punishment but that was just a warning letter. I think it looked bad for the next year but the score went up and SLU avoided the practice penalty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Littlebill Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 41 minutes ago, prebilliken said: Goodwin wearing 0 would be soooooo dope. Better #0, Goodwin or Polk? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prebilliken Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Just now, Littlebill said: Better #0, Goodwin or Polk? Goodwin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pistol Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 To be fair, Polk wore 00. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Littlebill Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 17 minutes ago, Pistol said: To be fair, Polk wore 00. I know - (it was a joke) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Littlebill Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 20 minutes ago, prebilliken said: Goodwin. Are you sure? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zink Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Can Gordon wear 00 if Goodwin has 0? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLURadioBoy Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Looks like Goodwin is deciding between 0 and 23. Zeke was 23 this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billikenfan05 Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 31 minutes ago, Littlebill said: Are you sure? If Goodwin can hit one three in his SLU career. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorydays2013 Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 59 minutes ago, SLURadioBoy said: Looks like Goodwin is deciding between 0 and 23. Zeke was 23 this season. Thats pretty savage if Zeke is still on this team next year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUBillsFan Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Glorydays2013 said: Thats pretty savage if Zeke is still on this team next year ...or maybe they talked about it and Zeke told him he could have 23. Goodwin wore 23 for Althoff. My guess is he decided on 0 because Zeke already had 23, Zeke told him he could have 23 if he wanted it, and now Goodwin is trying to decide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills_06 Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, RUBillsFan said: ...or maybe they talked about it and Zeke told him he could have 23. Goodwin wore 23 for Althoff. My guess is he decided on 0 because Zeke already had 23, Zeke told him he could have 23 if he wanted it, and now Goodwin is trying to decide. Yea that would be my guess. What number was Zeke in high school? Maybe he would've taken 0 but Bartley was a late transfer and already had it so he was already 23 by then but would be fine being 0 or 23 and will let Goodwin decide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorydays2013 Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 11 minutes ago, RUBillsFan said: ...or maybe they talked about it and Zeke told him he could have 23. Goodwin wore 23 for Althoff. My guess is he decided on 0 because Zeke already had 23, Zeke told him he could have 23 if he wanted it, and now Goodwin is trying to decide. That shows to me that Zeke doesn't have too much confidence in himself. I don't know about you but I wouldn't have a freshmen take my number, especially someone I would "compete" for playing time with Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franchise_08 Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 18 minutes ago, Glorydays2013 said: That shows to me that Zeke doesn't have too much confidence in himself. I don't know about you but I wouldn't have a freshmen take my number, especially someone I would "compete" for playing time with Or maybe Crawford or Agbeko had his number already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FromDaEastSide Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 37 minutes ago, Bills_06 said: Yea that would be my guess. What number was Zeke in high school? Maybe he would've taken 0 but Bartley was a late transfer and already had it so he was already 23 by then but would be fine being 0 or 23 and will let Goodwin decide. Zeke was 23 @ Riverview Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Littlebill Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 29 minutes ago, Glorydays2013 said: That shows to me that Zeke doesn't have too much confidence in himself. I don't know about you but I wouldn't have a freshmen take my number, especially someone I would "compete" for playing time with (chill) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billikenfan05 Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierPal Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 39 minutes ago, Glorydays2013 said: That shows to me that Zeke doesn't have too much confidence in himself. I don't know about you but I wouldn't have a freshmen take my number, especially someone I would "compete" for playing time with This may be your dumbest post ever. A jersey number, yes a piece of clothing = confidence in oneself? Really? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.