Jump to content

2016-17 Wins Prediction Thread


slufan13

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

4 hours ago, Old guy said:

Hello cheeseman, yes past performance may be taken into consideration in making a prediction, BUT it is not by itself a predictor of future performance, it must be combined with other factors. In our case we have a new coach, a new system of play, a new atmosphere in the interaction between players and coach, new players, old injuries, and new tricks that old dogs (players) may have learned from the new coach. We do not know as yet how all of these, and other as yet undetermined factors, will mix together, but the combination of all of these factors is what will determine our results for this season. This season will categorically not be a mere replay of the past season. We do not really know how much we will differ from last year's performance at this moment in time. However, I think that there is reason for optimism and for hoping we will perform better than last year coming from our performance in the exhibition game. Of course, I may be wrong, but that is part of the prediction game, it is just my guess and I have no crystal ball either, neither does anyone else.

 

Since this is all in fun, nobody is expecting to be held to their prediction.  I did acknowledge in my post that there were other factors that would impact if a player's previous performance would actually happen.  I still contend that when a team - any sport - is put together, those doing it do look at players past performance when considering trades and free agent signings. My point simply was that when a person makes a prediction in this type of a thread they are looking at past performance and simply not discounting it as you proposed in your first post..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/7/2016 at 6:51 AM, cheeseman said:

So what you are saying  is that past performance is not an indicator of future performance?  If you have a player that has scored 10 pts a game for 2 years then it is not reasonable to assume that he will at least do that again?  Yes I know factors impact that but is it not fair to assume that injuries or some other unrelated issue will  be in play?  A prediction is just that a best guess by the person making it.  No one is claiming to have a crystal ball.  Of course based on what people say it is fair to deduce that someone is either optimistic or pessimistic.  I usually do not get involved in predicting how many games a team will win or not win because frankly I do not want to waste my time and effort analyzing everything that must go into making a valid prediction but many do not feel that way so more power to them.  

Hey, ABomb -- doesn't this imply that SignGuy should compile a NowCast, a Polls-Only Forecast and a Polls-Plus Forecast? ;) 

Hey, SignGuy -- if you demonstrate a cool methodology, could you get that published as a paper that counts toward your tenure? :D 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bonwich said:

Hey, ABomb -- doesn't this imply that SignGuy should compile a NowCast, a Polls-Only Forecast and a Polls-Plus Forecast? ;) 

Hey, SignGuy -- if you demonstrate a cool methodology, could you get that published as a paper that counts toward your tenure? :D 

fivethirtyeight is owned by ESPN and they'd probably quote Pol. Scientist Steven Rogers again.  I think the Nowcast is at 13 and the Polls Plus for Billiken wins is at about 12.  We should see these numbers converge near the end of the race.  Although we do have our competitor prognosticator the Wiz that has his own methodology.  I think he incorporates more economic data into his such as Jersey and Hat sales.  He has been criticized in the past for just stealing his numbers from Vegas and also he misses all the hat sales at the Arena store so I think he might be off.  In all the Billiken predictive models white guys over 30 are waaaay over sampled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we should make this interesting...

Lets set the over/under at 12.5 wins. Those participating agree that if they are incorrect in the prediction that they will donate $50 to the Billikens.com Fundraiser. That would require Steve to reopen the payment processes in March, if he would agree. I think this will make it interesting and keep those with predictions accountable while benefiting the Motherland, Billikens.com.

 

The Pelican - under

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Pelican said:

I think we should make this interesting...

Lets set the over/under at 12.5 wins. Those participating agree that if they are incorrect in the prediction that they will donate $50 to the Billikens.com Fundraiser. That would require Steve to reopen the payment processes in March, if he would agree. I think this will make it interesting and keep those with predictions accountable while benefiting the Motherland, Billikens.com.

 

The Pelican - under

 

 

I said 12 so I will stick by the under. That way I can't lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, The Pelican said:

I think we should make this interesting...

Lets set the over/under at 12.5 wins. Those participating agree that if they are incorrect in the prediction that they will donate $50 to the Billikens.com Fundraiser. That would require Steve to reopen the payment processes in March, if he would agree. I think this will make it interesting and keep those with predictions accountable while benefiting the Motherland, Billikens.com.

 

The Pelican - under

 

 

I like the idea of a good bet, believe me, but I'm not sure incentivizing half the fans to call against the team is a good idea. We had that last year as people didn't want them to win down the stretch because they thought it would make it more likely that Crews is retained. We need to be united in rooting FOR the Bills this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kshoe said:

I like the idea of a good bet, believe me, but I'm not sure incentivizing half the fans to call against the team is a good idea. We had that last year as people didn't want them to win down the stretch because they thought it would make it more likely that Crews is retained. We need to be united in rooting FOR the Bills this year. 

This seems a little extreme. It's a win-win. Relax and have fun with it. If you are not rooting for the Bills either way then you should go to tigerboard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Quality Is Job 1 said:

Head (reasonable expectation): 13.

Heart (what I'd really like to see): 16+.

Fantasy (what I been smokin'?): 21 and an NIT appearance.

Put me down for head and I root for heart.

There are probably two other ranges, but I won't get into those.

Put me down for head also, but 'm going to leave my heart out of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Pelican said:

I think we should make this interesting...

Lets set the over/under at 12.5 wins. Those participating agree that if they are incorrect in the prediction that they will donate $50 to the Billikens.com Fundraiser. That would require Steve to reopen the payment processes in March, if he would agree. I think this will make it interesting and keep those with predictions accountable while benefiting the Motherland, Billikens.com.

 

The Pelican - under

 

 

Count me out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...