bills10 Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 The people who I heard names from announced it to the whole room, but when I pressed for sources, they said they couldn't tell who told but that they could not say with certainty their info was correct. Unfortunately, a room of 30 well connected and chatty people were told potentially incorrect information. Damage done. This could be the pipeline that people have heard this through... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbofive Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Jimbo, you must have a metro pass... you got the C word by the filter.NO COMBINATION OF KEYSTROKES IS BEYOND MY GRASP. UNLESS I HIT THE MAX CHARACTER LIMIT OR THE THICK STEVENARK MONSTER PUTS THE KIBOSH ON ME. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cushirishbill Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Jimbo, you must have a metro pass... you got the C word by the filter. Argyle Wade had the ultimate metro pass... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbofive Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Argyle Wade had the ultimate metro pass...he needed a metro pass after the hammer fell on him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saluki762 Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 he needed a metro pass after the hammer fell on him.never been a more deserving person. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmbilliken Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 I don't see how it could be, but I am certainly not a lawyer and I guess that is why nobody will actually come out and say who the players are rumored to be.The truth is always a defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SluSignGuy Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 For those concerned, I am for now leaving this thread open. I appreciate that speculated names have not been posted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pakapablo Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 SLU students sexual assault investigation ongoing By Gabrielle Biondo Originally published May 3, 2010 at 11:52 a.m., updated May 3, 2010 at 11:52 a.m. St. Louis police said Monday no charges have been filed and they are still investigating a sexual assault case involving three St. Louis University students. St. Louis Metropolitan Police said the incident happened between 3 and 4 a.m. Saturday, May 1 in the 3400 block of Laclede Avenue. University officials said the location is the Grand Forest Apartments. Police said a student reported she was sexually assaulted by two male students in the campus dorm. According to police, the victim knew the two male students. The two students accused of the attack were taken into police custody and questioned, but have been released pending the application of warrants with the circuit attorney's office. Police said they have not turned the investigation of the early Saturday morning incident over to prosecutors yet. Police and the university will not release the names of those accused until or unless warrants are issued. School officials sent a campus alert after the alleged incident was reported. Officials also said representatives of Student Life, Campus Ministry and Student Health & Counseling are providing support to the female student. STL Globe Democrat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OC Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 I understand what libelous means. Not so sure you understand what common decency means though. What makes you think I don't know what common decency means? I haven't said any names, nor have I been arrested. Are you kidding me? Or are you that upset about this, Mrs. Cleaver? Libelous and common decency aren't as related as you infer. Perhaps your quest for common decency should expand beyond billikens.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redbirdfan Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Ok...was it really necessary to go posting about this situation on other boards.....seriously? are you really a Billiken fan? http://www.basketballforum.com/atlantic-10...al-assault.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boudder Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 and it begins.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dlarry Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Ok...was it really necessary to go posting about this situation on other boards.....seriously? are you really a Billiken fan? http://www.basketballforum.com/atlantic-10...al-assault.html Posting on another site isnt that bad but opening an account on another board just to post it is pretty lame and thats what that guy did Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redbirdfan Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Posting on another site isnt that bad but opening an account on another board just to post it is pretty lame and thats what that guy did Yes..I noticed that his credibility rate was a BIG FAT 0! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slu72 Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 What makes you think I don't know what common decency means? I haven't said any names, nor have I been arrested. Are you kidding me? Or are you that upset about this, Mrs. Cleaver? Libelous and common decency aren't as related as you infer. Perhaps your quest for common decency should expand beyond billikens.com. I didn't infer libel had anything to do with common decency. Libel is slandering a person's reputation, character, etc w/o any justification. You were questioning that it wouldn't be libelous to name names. It would be if they were the wrong names. Example; Someone says, OC's an embezzler when he isn't. But even if they were the right names, and who really knows at this point, it would be a violation of common decency, these kids do have parents, family, and friends, to post them on this board. It's a legal matter and officials aren't citing any names, so letting it run it's course would seem the DECENT thing to do. Don't you agree, Beav? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tenthyearsenior Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 You would think the news would be running with the story by now if there was a story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OC Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 I didn't infer libel had anything to do with common decency. Libel is slandering a person's reputation, character, etc w/o any justification. You were questioning that it wouldn't be libelous to name names. It would be if they were the wrong names. Example; Someone says, OC's an embezzler when he isn't. But even if they were the right names, and who really knows at this point, it would be a violation of common decency, these kids do have parents, family, and friends, to post them on this board. It's a legal matter and officials aren't citing any names, so letting it run it's course would seem the DECENT thing to do. Don't you agree, Beav? I hear you, and for the record I haven't named names. But I don't think it's libel to say X and Y were arrested...if in fact they were arrested. The gal who was given the business to, also has parents, family, and friends--and probably an ended student(/athlete?) career at SLU. Furthermore, Tony Dow was a great actor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyJumpUp Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OC Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 Question: Let's say no charges are filed, but there's ample evidence of foul play, immoral action, or even a past history of improper behavior from one or both of the Billiken players... ...and SLU decides to boot them from school. Is there a fear on SLU's part of the players coming back at SLU legally? Being a private institution I'm semi-assuming that they can dismiss students easier without any real charge/conviction, etc. Am I wrong? Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianstl Posted May 3, 2010 Share Posted May 3, 2010 I hear you, and for the record I haven't named names. But I don't think it's libel to say X and Y were arrested...if in fact they were arrested. The gal who was given the business to, also has parents, family, and friends--and probably an ended student(/athlete?) career at SLU. Furthermore, Tony Dow was a great actor. We don't know what happened yet. We don't know if they were arrested or just brought in for questioning. The only thing we know is the police at this time have decided they don't have enough to turn the case over to the prosecutor's office. This is why we shouldn't bring up names yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billikenOHsix Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 At the very least it is very disappointing that these two would put themselves in this position. Agreed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quality Is Job 1 Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 Most of us already know the names....just give it a rest!Some of us DON'T know the names and wish they could wake up and discover it was all just a bad dream. (Please don't PM me with names! I'm serious.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quality Is Job 1 Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 Jimbo, you must have a metro pass... you got the C word by the filter. NO COMBINATION OF KEYSTROKES IS BEYOND MY GRASP. UNLESS I HIT THE MAX CHARACTER LIMIT OR THE THICK STEVENARK MONSTER PUTS THE KIBOSH ON ME.Kiboshed. It may be hours later, but I don't think that post was appropriate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slufan13 Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 any new news? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billikenOHsix Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 Still only rumors as far as I've heard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westy03 Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 I would assume ksdk or stltoday would report when the police were done with the investigation but I havent found anything. This could take a long time to develop... Isnt it finals week at SLU? That has to be a tough situation for all parties involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.